Summary

Quantifying Fitness Costs in Transgenic Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes

Published: September 15, 2023
doi:

Summary

The present protocol describes how to measure common life parameter data in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, including fecundity, wing size, fertility, sex ratio, viability, development times, male contribution, and adult longevity. These measurements can be used to assess the fitness of transgenic mosquitoes.

Abstract

Transgenic mosquitoes often display fitness costs compared to their wild-type counterparts. In this regard, fitness cost studies involve collecting life parameter data from genetically modified mosquitoes and comparing them to mosquitoes lacking transgenes from the same genetic background. This manuscript illustrates how to measure common life history traits in the mosquito Aedes aegypti, including fecundity, wing size and shape, fertility, sex ratio, viability, development times, male contribution, and adult longevity. These parameters were chosen because they reflect reproductive success, are simple to measure, and are commonly reported in the literature. The representative results quantify fitness costs associated with either a gene knock-out or a single insertion of a gene drive element. Standardizing how life parameter data are collected is important because such data may be used to compare the health of transgenic mosquitoes generated across studies or to model the transgene fixation rate in a simulated wild-type mosquito population. Although this protocol is specific for transgenic Aedes aegypti, the protocol may also be used for other mosquito species or other experimental treatment conditions, with the caveat that certain biological contexts may require special adaptations.

Introduction

Survival of the fittest is the Darwinian idea that individuals who harbor genes best adapted to their environment will pass those genes to subsequent generations1. This means that it is fitness that determines whether their genes will survive. This more than 150-year-old concept is perhaps the most significant determinant of engineering a successful gene drive in transgenic mosquitoes. Gene drives, or the super-Mendelian inheritance pattern of a selfish genetic element that allows it to spread through populations2, are being explored for genetic pest management3. In the context of vector control, this strategy aims to either replace wild-type (WT) arthropods with those resistant to pathogens (population modification) or eliminate them all together (population suppression)4. However, transgenic mosquitoes often exhibit fitness costs (also called genetic load) in comparison to their WT counterparts, which means that the transgene will be lost in populations that can outcompete them. Coupling transgenes with a gene drive system is therefore necessary to offset any fitness costs and push the transgene through the population at levels greater than expected from typical Mendelian inheritance4.

Laboratory studies across mosquito vector species have shown that transgenes often display fitness costs5,6,7. For example, Irvin et al. measured various life parameters in Aedes (Ae.) aegypti engineered to express enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) or transposase genes under Drosophila actin 5C or synthetic 3XP3 promoters, and compared them to the wild-type Orlando strain (the same genetic background from which they were derived)5. Most notably, they found that all transgenic strains had significantly reduced reproductive fitness5. Dependent on the transgene, some Anopheles (An.) mosquitoes expressing transgenes that inhibited Plasmodium parasite development also exhibited fitness costs6. Specifically, An. stephensi expressing a bee venom phospholipase (PLA2) under constitutive or bloodmeal-inducible promoters laid significantly fewer eggs compared to controls6. Those authors also found that transgenic Anopheles expressing a different transgene, an SM1 dodecapeptide tetramer did not exhibit fitness costs, leading them to conclude that transgene-conferred fitness costs are dependent on, at least likely in part, the effect of the transgenic protein produced6. Indeed, fitness costs may be attributed to transgene products, positional effects, off-target effects, insertional mutagenesis, or inbreeding effects in laboratory-reared strains7. Gene drives must therefore be robust enough to offset these transgene-induced fitness costs while also avoiding the development of insertions and deletions (indels) that block the drive itself.

Developmental or reproductive fitness costs can be measured in laboratory or cage studies7, with a caveat being that unknown factors in the field may also have an impact. Nonetheless, controlled fitness studies are an important first step when planning or evaluating genetically modified mosquito releases, such as a gene drive program, to determine whether the transgenic line will persist over subsequent generations. For example, Hammond et al. evaluated An gambiae CRISPR/Cas9-based-gene drives meant to disrupt the genes necessary for female fertility8. Through cage studies maintained for at least 25 generations, the authors found that the mosquitoes incurred gene-drive resistant alleles that blocked CRISPR-targeted cleavage and restored female fertility8. Their modeling efforts suggested that fertility in females heterozygous for the gene drive had the most dramatic impacts on gene drive fixation in simulated conditions8. Along these same lines, Ae. aegypti (Higgs' White Eye strain, HWE) engineered to express autonomous gene drive cassettes under different promoters or at different intergenic loci exhibited different rates of gene drive fixation in simulated populations9. Using MGDrivE modeling10, combined with measured rates of indel formation, maternal effects, and laboratory-collected life parameter data, the authors found that mosquito fitness most strongly influenced the persistence of the gene drive in simulated conditions9. Fitness costs that are most likely to impair gene drive efficiency are attributable to somatic Cas9 (over) expression or from the gene that is targeted, particularly in heterozygotes, rather than the intrinsic drive itself11,12,13,14,15,16,17.

Given its significance, fitness is an important factor for the ability of a transgenic line to persist over subsequent generations, and it can be used as an indicator for any physiological effects associated with a transgene. For example, off-target effects may be associated with fitness costs. In this case, backcrossing a transgenic line for several generations is recommended. Furthermore, crossing the transgenic line with one that is reflective of a field population may also be necessary to investigate how well the transgenic population can compete in the real world. To quantify fitness costs so that they can be comparable, this manuscript provides simple protocols for measuring common life history traits in Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, with a particular emphasis on fitness costs associated with transgenes, so that such studies can be more easily reproduced. Protocols include fecundity, fertility, sex ratio, viability, development times, male contribution, and adult longevity. Measuring wing length and area was also chosen as a fitness measurement as it correlates with thorax length18,19 and body size measurements, which is directly linked to bloodmeal size, fecundity, and immunity20,21. Although there are many ways to assess fitness, these parameters were chosen because they reflect reproductive success, are simple to measure, and are commonly reported in the literature.

Protocol

NOTE: This protocol is written for transgenic and wild-type Ae. aegypti lines that have been previously validated and established. For more information on generating transgenic Ae. aegypti, see Kistler et al.22 and Coates et al.23. All experiments outlined below were performed under standard Ae. aegypti rearing procedures. Mosquitoes were maintained at 28 °C with 75%-80% relative humidity and a 12 h …

Representative Results

Following the above protocol, the fitness of two mosquito lines were evaluated: (1) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock out of the Ae. aegypti D7L1 (AAEL006424) salivary protein and (2) Ae. aegypti lines expressing autonomous CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene drives9. In the case of the former, a homozygous D7L1 knock-out line was established by exploiting the non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) to generate the disruption after microinjecting embryos with sgRNAs specific to the D7L1</em…

Discussion

Ae. aegypti fitness studies are often performed in the laboratory to assess fitness costs associated with transgenic cargo (e.g., gene drive elements) or gene knock outs, as discussed in this manuscript; however, these studies may be performed for a variety of purposes—any that aim to evaluate the health of an Ae. aegypti group, such as Wolbachia-infected30,31, insecticide resistant32,</s…

Declarações

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Bill Reid and Alexander Franz from the University of Missouri for their support with this protocol. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Benjamin Krajacich from the NIH/NIAID for his support with the R analysis. This study was funded by the NIH, grant number R01 AI130085 (KEO), and the NIH/NIAID Division of Intramural Research Program AI001246 (EC).

Materials

1 oz. translucent plastic souffle cups WebstaurantStore 301100PC
2 oz. translucent polystyrene souffle cups WebstaurantStore 760P200N
3 mL plastic pipettors  Cornin 357524
50 mL conical tubes Any brand
64 oz. white double poly-coated paper food cup WebstaurantStore 999SOUP64WB for mosquito enclosement
65 mm lens  Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro Photo Canon Macro Photo MP-E 65mm, 7D-65mm-1X; zoom=1, 200, 6.3, ISO=100; for photographing wings or egg papers, although other cameras are likely sufficient
Aedes aegypti mosquitoes BEI multiple strains as eggs are available
Artifical membrane feeders https://lillieglassblowers.com/ Meduim membrane feeder, Custom made, 33mm Chemglass also offers, but sizes are wrong for us. Ours are about 3 cm?
ATP MP Biomedical ICN15026605 Any good quality ATP, 10mM filter sterile aliquots at -20
Autoclave for sterilizing water for hatching
Canon EOS 7D camera  Canon 3814B004 for photographing wings or egg papers, although other cameras are likely sufficient
defibrinated sheep blood  Colorado Serum Co. 60 ml, every 2 weeks https://colorado-serum-com.3dcartstores.com/sheep-defibrinated
Dual Gooseneck Microscope Illuminator Dolan Jenner Fiber-Lite 180 181-1 System
Ethanol
Forceps Dumont 5SF
Gauze omnisorb ii 4" non-woven sponges
glass microscope slide Fisher Scientific 12-544-2
Glass Petri dishes, 100 × 15 mm VWR 75845-546 for anesthesizing/manipulating mosquitoes on ice
Hogs' gut Any Deli we buy in bulk, split, wash and store in small aliquots of ~4X12" at -20 in 50 ml conical
Ice
Ice bucket
Kimwipe Fisher Scientific 06-666A
Leica GZ4 StereoZoom microscope for screening transgenic mosquitoes (if applicable)
Paintbrush AIT synthetic brush  size 10-0 for manipulating larvae/pupae (Amazon)
Panty hose Walmart L'eggs Everyday  Women's Nylon Plus Knee Highs Sheer Toe, 16 pairs (plus fits the carton)
Pencils Any brand
Plastic containers for 2° storage of cartons Walmart Sterilite 58 Qt Storage Box Clear Base White Lid Set of 8
Plastic containers for growing larvae Walmart Sterilite 28 Qt. Storage Box Plastic, White, Set of 10
Plastic containers for hatching larvae Walmart Sterilite 6 Qt. Storage Box Plastic, White
polypropylene clear deli containers  WebstaurantStore  127DM12BULK 12 oz, or 16 oz if needed for bigger (127RD16BULK)
Rubber bands Office Max  #100736/#909606 /#3777415 12", #64 and #10
Rubber stopper VWR 217-0515 for mosquito enclosement
Sugar source, such as sugar cubes or raisins
Tetramin flake food Tetramin 16106
tpsDig Stony Brook Morphometrics A free morphometric image-processing software distributed online available at https://www.sbmorphometrics.org/
tpsUtil Stony Brook Morphometrics A free morphometric image-processing software distributed online available at https://www.sbmorphometrics.org/
White organza fabric 8” × 8” FabricWholesale.com  4491676 Joann Casa Collection Organza Fabric by Casa Collection 
Whitman Grade 1 Qualitative Filter paper  Whitman 1001-824 for egg papers. The white color makes it easier to see the black eggs.

Referências

  1. Dawkins, R. . The Selfish Gene. New edition. , (1989).
  2. Crow, J. F. Unmasking a Cheating Gene. Science. 283 (5408), 1651-1652 (1999).
  3. Gould, F. Broadening the application of evolutionarily based genetic pest management. Evolution. 62 (2), 500-510 (2008).
  4. Williams, A. E., Franz, A. W. E., Reid, W. R., Olson, K. E. Antiviral effectors and gene drive strategies for mosquito population suppression or replacement to mitigate arbovirus transmission by Aedes aegypti. Insects. 11 (1), (2020).
  5. Irvin, N., Hoddle, M. S., O’Brochta, D. A., Carey, B., Atkinson, P. W. Assessing fitness costs for transgenic Aedes aegypti expressing the GFP marker and transposase genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (3), 891-896 (2004).
  6. Moreira, L. A., Wang, J., Collins, F. H., Jacobs-Lorena, M. Fitness of anopheline mosquitoes expressing transgenes that inhibit Plasmodium development. Genética. 166 (3), 1337-1341 (2004).
  7. Dilani, P. V. D., Dassanayake, R. S., Tyagi, B. K., Silva Gunawardene, ., N, Y. I. The impact of transgenesis on mosquito fitness: A review. Frontiers in Insect Science. 38, (2022).
  8. Hammond, A. M., et al. The creation and selection of mutations resistant to a gene drive over multiple generations in the malaria mosquito. PLOS Genetics. 13 (10), (2017).
  9. Reid, W., et al. Assessing single-locus CRISPR/Cas9-based gene drive variants in the mosquito Aedes aegypti via single-generation crosses and modeling. 3 (12), (2022).
  10. Wu, S. L., et al. MGDrivE 2: A simulation framework for gene drive systems incorporating seasonality and epidemiological dynamics. PLOS Computational Biology. 17 (5), (2021).
  11. Oberhofer, G., Ivy, T., Hay, B. A. Gene drive and resilience through renewal with next generation Cleave and Rescue selfish genetic elements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (16), 9013-9021 (2020).
  12. Adolfi, A., et al. Efficient population modification gene-drive rescue system in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Nature Communications. 11 (1), 5553 (2020).
  13. Carballar-Lejarazu, R., et al. Next-generation gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (37), 22805-22814 (2020).
  14. Champer, J., et al. A CRISPR homing gene drive targeting a haplolethal gene removes resistance alleles and successfully spreads through a cage population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (39), 24377-24383 (2020).
  15. Champer, S. E. 1. 5., et al. Computational and experimental performance of CRISPR homing gene drive strategies with multiplexed gRNAs. Science Advances. 6 (10), (2020).
  16. Li, M., et al. Development of a confinable gene drive system in the human disease vector Aedes aegypti. eLife. 9. 51701, (2020).
  17. Champer, S. E., Kim, I. K., Clark, A. G., Messer, P. W., Champer, J. Anopheles homing suppression drive candidates exhibit unexpected performance differences in simulations with spatial structure. eLife. 11, 79121 (2022).
  18. Petersen, V., et al. Assessment of the correlation between wing size and body weight in captive Culex quinquefasciatus. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 49 (4), 508-511 (2016).
  19. Yeap, H. L., Hoffmann, A. A., Endersby, N. M., Ritchie, S. A., Johnson, P. H. Body size and wing shape measurements as quality indicators of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes destined for field release. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 89 (1), 78-92 (2013).
  20. Fecundity Briegel, H. metabolism, and body size in Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae), vectors of malaria. Journal of Medical Entomology. 27 (5), 839-850 (1990).
  21. Hurd, H., Hogg, J. C., Renshaw, M. Interactions between bloodfeeding, fecundity and infection in mosquitoes. Parasitology Today. 11 (11), 411-416 (1995).
  22. Kistler, K. E., Vosshall, L. B., Matthews, B. J. Genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Cell Reports. 11 (1), 51-60 (2015).
  23. Coates, C. J., Jasinskiene, N., Miyashiro, L., James, A. A. Mariner transposition and transformation of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95 (7), 3748-3751 (1998).
  24. Carvalho, D. O., et al. Mass production of genetically modified Aedes aegypti for field releases in Brazil. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 83 (83), (2014).
  25. Clemons, A., Mori, A., Haugen, M., Severson, D. W., Duman-Scheel, M. Culturing and egg collection of Aedes aegypti. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. (10), (2010).
  26. Rohlf, F. J. TpsDig (2.32) [Computer software. , (2018).
  27. Rohlf, F. J. TpsUtil (1.79) [Computer software. , (2018).
  28. Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, H. D., Fink, W. L. . Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists. , (2017).
  29. Size Klingenberg, C. P., shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Development Genes and Evolution. 226 (3), 113-137 (2016).
  30. Axford, J. K., Ross, P. A., Yeap, H. L., Callahan, A. G., Hoffmann, A. A. Fitness of wAlbB Wolbachia infection in Aedes aegypti: Parameter estimates in an outcrossed background and potential for population invasion. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 94 (3), 507-516 (2016).
  31. Ross, P. A., Hoffmann, A. A. Fitness costs of Wolbachia shift in locally-adapted Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Environmental Microbiology. 24 (12), 5749-5759 (2022).
  32. Rigby, L. M., Johnson, B. J., Peatey, C. L., Beebe, N. W., Devine, G. J. The impact of sublethal permethrin exposure on susceptible and resistant genotypes of the urban disease vector Aedes aegypti. Pest Management Science. 77 (7), 3450-3457 (2021).
  33. Smith, L. B., Silva, J. J., Chen, C., Harrington, L. C., Scott, J. G. Fitness costs of individual and combined pyrethroid resistance mechanisms, kdr and CYP-mediated detoxification, in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 15 (3), 0009271 (2021).
  34. Chaves, B. A., et al. Vertical transmission of Zika virus (Flaviviridae, Flavivirus) in Amazonian Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) delays egg hatching and larval development of progeny. Journal of Medical Entomology. 56 (6), 1739-1744 (2019).
  35. Kuno, G. Early history of laboratory breeding of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) focusing on the origins and use of selected strains. Journal of Medical Entomology. 47 (6), 957-971 (2010).
  36. David, M., Garcia, G., Valle, D., Maciel-de-Freitas, R. Insecticide resistance and fitness: the case of four Aedes aegypti populations from different Brazilian regions. BioMed Research International. , (2018).
  37. Wendell, M. D., Wilson, T. G., Higgs, S., Black, W. C. Chemical and gamma-ray mutagenesis of the white gene in Aedes aegypti. Insect Molecular Biology. 9 (2), 119-125 (2000).
  38. Koenraadt, C. J., Kormaksson, M., Harrington, L. C. Effects of inbreeding and genetic modification on Aedes aegypti larval competition and adult energy reserves. Parasites and Vectors. 3, (2010).
  39. Rezende, G. L., et al. Embryonic desiccation resistance in Aedes aegypti: presumptive role of the chitinized serosal cuticle. BMC Developmental Biology. 8, (2008).
  40. Farnesi, L. C., Vargas, H. C. M., Valle, D., Rezende, G. L. Darker eggs of mosquitoes resist more to dry conditions: Melanin enhances serosal cuticle contribution in egg resistance to desiccation in Aedes, Anopheles and Culex vectors. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 11 (10), (2017).
  41. Carvalho, D. O., et al. Mosquito pornoscopy: Observation and interruption of Aedes aegypti copulation to determine female polyandric event and mixed progeny. PLoS ONE. 13 (3), (2018).
  42. Helinski, M. E., Harrington, L. C. Male mating history and body size influence female fecundity and longevity of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Journal of Medical Entomology. 48 (2), 202-211 (2011).
  43. Felipe Ramarez-Sanchez, ., Camargo, L., Avila, C., W, F. Male sexual history influences female fertility and re-mating incidence in the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Insect Physiology. 121, 104019 (2020).
check_url/pt/65136?article_type=t

Play Video

Citar este artigo
Williams, A. E., Sanchez-Vargas, I., Martin, L. E., Martin-Martin, I., Bennett, S., Olson, K. E., Calvo, E. Quantifying Fitness Costs in Transgenic Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes. J. Vis. Exp. (199), e65136, doi:10.3791/65136 (2023).

View Video