Summary

A Mouse Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Procedure Aided by Microscopy

Published: January 19, 2024
doi:

Summary

Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been shown to result in remarkable liver regeneration after several weeks post first-stage surgery. Animal models that have undergone ALPPS have been developed to explore potential liver regeneration ability and achieve favorable clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Hepatectomy is widely regarded as the primary treatment for hepatic malignancies; yet, postoperative liver failure remains a major cause of perioperative mortality, severely impacting patient outcomes. In a robust hepatic environment, the future liver remnant (FLR) must exceed 25%, and in cases of cirrhosis, this requirement increases to over 40%. The inadequacy of FLR is currently a major obstacle in the progression of hepatic surgery.

Traditional methods to enhance FLR hypertrophy mainly focus on portal vein embolization (PVE), but its effectiveness is considerably limited. In recent years, there have been numerous reports on a novel biphasic hepatectomy method involving hepatic partitioning and portal vein ligation, known as associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). ALPPS surpasses PVE in efficiently and considerably inducing FLR hypertrophy. However, the detailed mechanisms driving ALPPS-facilitated hepatic regeneration are not fully understood. Thus, replicating ALPPS in animal models is crucial to thoroughly investigate the molecular mechanisms of hepatic regeneration, offering valuable theoretical and practical insights.

Introduction

The liver harbors formidable regenerative potential, swiftly proliferating and restoring metabolic demands within a mere 3 months following resection for diverse hepatic ailments1. However, the imperative to ascertain the completeness of tumor margins necessitates the inevitability of expansive hepatic excision. Thus, ensuring an ample volume of the participatory hepatic milieu, known as the future liver remnant (FLR), assumes paramount importance2. ALPPS has been a breakthrough technique in hepatic surgery over the past few decades, particularly tailored for patients with inadequate residual hepatic volume subsequent to tumor resection, heralded as one of the most auspicious breakthroughs in the realm of hepatic oncological surgery3.

Remarkable progress has been made in developing ALPPS animal models. An ideal model typically requires independent blood inflow (portal vein and hepatic artery) and outflow (hepatic vein) in the preserved hepatic lobe and a clear separation between the preserved and the to-be-resected hepatic lobes to prevent collateral circulation4. Although ALPPS stimulates rapid hepatic regeneration in the remaining liver tissue, the specific mechanisms of this process are still unclear.

Currently, ALPPS models are categorized into three types: large animal models (e.g., swine and sheep), medium-sized models (e.g., rabbits and rodents), and small models (e.g., mice)5. The use of mice, with their quick breeding, cost-effectiveness, and ease of genetic modification, is particularly effective for in-depth studies of hepatic regeneration mechanisms6. Moreover, the liver structure of mice, especially their middle hepatic vein, closely resembles that of humans, making them highly suitable for ALPPS model development.

It is important to note that most hepatocellular carcinoma patients in clinical practice have underlying liver conditions, unlike the healthy liver models typically used in studies7. Thus, using mice preconditioned with hepatic fibrosis or viral infections can more accurately simulate the surgical responses and postoperative liver regeneration seen in patients with various liver diseases8. This approach could reveal new therapeutic targets of clinical relevance.

So far, a few renowned research groups, such as those at the University of Zurich and the University of Tokyo, have successfully developed murine ALPPS models9,10. Creating a standardized murine model under controlled conditions could advance our understanding of the rapid liver regeneration observed after ALPPS procedures.

Protocol

All experiments in this protocol were approved by the Veterinary Authorities of the Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital (number 70/2022). Furthermore, all experimental steps were performed in strict compliance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. 1. Start of surgery NOTE: Male C57BL/6 mice weighing 20-22 g were housed in a well-ventilated cage, maintained in a standard pathogen-free environment with a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle. …

Representative Results

In contrast to the PVL (protocol steps 2,3,4, and 5), the mice that were subjected to the ALPPS (steps 2,3,4,5, and 6) surgical intervention demonstrated a heightened proclivity towards cellular proliferation. Figure 2 delineates the ischemic demarcation of the middle liver lobe following portal vein ligation, along with the visual field during liver transection, which represents a key distinction between ALPPS and PVL. Notably, the levels of inflammatory mediators, including (Tumor Necrosis…

Discussion

This study presents a protocol for the initial phase of ALPPS surgery in mice, involving partial ligation of the portal vein and division of the median liver lobe. This method closely mimics the human ALPPS procedure, with the mouse liver's unique lobular structure and dual portal venous supply to the median lobe ensuring distinct blood flow post-surgery11. It is noteworthy that the ALPPS procedure comprises two distinct surgical stages. In this study, we exclusively present the initial stage …

Declarações

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

None

Materials

5% glucose injection (500 mL) Shapuaisi pharma (http://www.zjspas.com/) H20003666 Efficient, cheap,Easy to access
anaesthesia machine RWD (www.rwdls.com) R500 low price and valuable quality. It is suitable for operations with beginners
C57 BL/6 The Jackson Lab 22349-2023 Stability of strains
isoflurane KCSW (kcsw.szqisoubao.com) H19980141 durable, cost-effective
meloxicam Boehringer-Ingelheim H20020217 Durable and efficient
microforceps maydeal 60018920 Durable and efficient
microinstrument CH microsurgical instrument factory HC-A804-1 durable, cost-effective
sodium lactate ringer Shapuaisi pharma (http://www.zjspas.com/) H20193277 Efficient, cheap, easy to access
suture line CH microsurgical instrument factory 6-0/8-0 high performance-price ratio
topical antibodies chenxin pharmacology (www.cisen-pharma.com) H20020217 Effectively avoid incision infection

Referências

  1. Michalopoulos, G. K., Bhushan, B. Liver regeneration: Biological and pathological mechanisms and implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 18 (1), 40-55 (2021).
  2. Chapelle, T., et al. Estimation of the future remnant liver function is a better tool to pr edict post-hepatectomy liver failure than platelet-based liver scores. Eur J Surg Oncol. 43 (12), 2277-2284 (2017).
  3. Isfordink, C. J., et al. Portal vein ligation versus portal vein embolization for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. 26 (3), 257-267 (2017).
  4. Linecker, M., et al. Risk adjustment in alpps is associated with a dramatic decrease in ear ly mortality and morbidity. Ann Surg. 266 (5), 779-786 (2017).
  5. Darnis, B., et al. Subtotal hepatectomy in swine for studying small-for-size syndrome and portal inflow modulation: Is it reliable. HPB (Oxford). 17 (10), 881-888 (2015).
  6. Casellas, J. Inbred mouse strains and genetic stability: A review. Animal. 5 (1), 1-7 (2011).
  7. Zhang, J., et al. Evolution of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy from 2012 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Review. Int J Surg. 103, 106648 (2022).
  8. Parola, M., Pinzani, M. Liver fibrosis: Pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical iss ues. Mol Aspects Med. 65, 37-55 (2019).
  9. Kikuchi, Y., et al. Impact of associating liver partition and portal vein occlusion for st aged hepatectomy on tumor growth in a mouse model of liver metastasis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 44 (1), 130-138 (2018).
  10. Schlegel, A., et al. Alpps: From human to mice highlighting accelerated and novel mechanism s of liver regeneration. Ann Surg. 260 (5), 839-846 (2014).
  11. Dili, A., Lebrun, V., Bertrand, C., Leclercq, I. A. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepate ctomy: Establishment of an animal model with insufficient liver remnan t. Lab Invest. 99 (5), 698-707 (2019).
  12. Schadde, E., Hertl, M., Breitenstein, S., Beck-Schimmer, B., Schläpfer, M. Rat model of the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (alpps) procedure. J Vis Exp. (126), e55895 (2017).
  13. Allaire, M., et al. New frontiers in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep. 2 (4), 100134 (2020).
  14. Memi, F., Ntokou, A., Papangeli, I. Crispr/cas9 gene-editing: Research technologies, clinical applications and ethical considerations. Semin Perinatol. 42 (8), 487-500 (2018).
  15. Saviano, A., Henderson, N. C., Baumert, T. F. Single-cell genomics and spatial transcriptomics: Discovery of novel cell states and cellular interactions in liver physiology and disease biology. J Hepatol. 73 (5), 1219-1230 (2020).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Citar este artigo
Hu, C., Xu, Z., Du, Y. A Mouse Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Procedure Aided by Microscopy. J. Vis. Exp. (203), e66098, doi:10.3791/66098 (2024).

View Video