JoVE Science Education
Cognitive Psychology
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Science Education Cognitive Psychology
Verbal Priming
  • 00:00Visão Geral
  • 00:58Experimental Design
  • 02:30Running the Experiment
  • 04:09Representative Results
  • 04:38Applications
  • 05:56Summary

口头的启动

English

COMPARTILHAR

Visão Geral

资料来源: 实验室的乔纳森 Flombaum — — 约翰 · 霍普金斯大学

人类的记忆似乎在两大方面的工作。现代计算机一样,人类的心灵已明确,或声明性,内存: 问一个问题,和一个人给出的答案,他们可以。计算机程序和输入一个查询,返回其存储记忆的相关部分的内容。

人类也有记忆系统,一个不是很典型的计算机,一个实验心理学家们称之为隐式二种。

内隐记忆是一个广泛的术语,指的是过去的经验会影响目前的行为在许多方面。巴甫洛夫的著名的狗,例如,学会与进餐时间相关联的钟声。最终,他们开始垂涎每当他们听到铃声,即使食物不送。

人类也拥有内隐记忆。内隐记忆,例如,人就很难在一个新的地方; 入睡的原因人将他们的卧室环境和他们夜间的例程与嗜睡相关联。

内隐记忆是思想指导人的行为,在各种各样的情况。它是记忆的记忆的那种的引导礼仪和社会行为,那种把相关概念和直觉放在一个人的指尖。在许多方面内, 隐记忆是什么让人准备过程根据过去新的相遇。

实验心理学家探讨内隐记忆的一种方法是用称为口头启动范式。此视频演示为调查通过口头启动的内隐记忆的性质的过程。

Procedimento

1.刺激设计 本实验要求参与者做出判断字母字符串是否英语单词或不。 首先生成 30 常见英语中的名词作为列表图 1. 随机将单词划分为三个列表 10 中的单词每个作为图 1. 图 1:30 个字口头启动实验。30 字分为 10 单独列出要用作基本单词,一个要用作新的测试单词,,一个争相以创建非词。 10 非词语使用三个列表之一作为基地的单子。随机排序中的十个单词产生并不是英语的单词,如图 2 所示的字符串的每个字母。 图 2:生成乱码,非单词。非字是从十原词创建的。 拨出一套十个字,作为”新词语”在实验中,测试阶段使用和使用的剩余的十个单词作为”总理词”。 2.程序 实验包括两个短的阶段。第一个是”曝光”阶段,和第二个是”测试”阶段。 告诉参与者,这是语言的研究,将使用加速的反应在不同的任务中了解人如何学会阅读和拼写。 在实验的第一部分,’曝光’ 阶段,提出了每位学员的每一次,总理一句话集中在 500 ms 屏幕。 参与者的任务是使用按下一个键来指示他们看到这个词是否更有可能被发现在室内或室外。请参见图 3 图 3:接触阶段的口头启动实验。每次的试验,证明了一句话,和观察员的任务是判断 word 作为更有可能会显示在室内或室外。 这是一个”封面任务”,包括,以使学员了解总理的话没有直接去问他要到内存编码字。 实验的第二部分是测试阶段。每项试验将包括字眼或非从这三个列表之一的字眼之一。目前词混合在一起并以随机的顺序。参与者的任务是判断字母组成的字符串,每次试验是一个词还是非单词,使用按键来指示选择。请参见图 4。 图 4:测试阶段的口头启动实验。每次的试验,证明了一句话,和观察员的任务是判断字符串是否是一个词或一个非字。 强调对参与者,他们应该尽可能快而不会牺牲准确性。因变量是反应时间或延迟 — — 多少时间间隔从每个测试阶段单词的外观给参与者作出准确的回应。 口头的起爆技术的使用允许调查内隐记忆的性质。 内隐记忆是指的无意识的影响,过去的经验对人类行为。 让我们详细阐述。如果一个人经常睡在特定的环境中,他可能会觉得很困,如果放在新的环境,与类似的环境。 来自睡眠环境总理个人作出反应以类似的方式,即使那个人可能不记得在房间里的特定对象的对象。 通过口头启动范式,使用该视频演示了如何设计刺激并进行仿真实验,以及如何分析和解释数据调查内隐记忆。 本实验包括短分两个阶段: 接触阶段和测试阶段。在接触阶段,与会者简要显示单词列表中,被称为总理的话,并要求确定找到了在室内或室外。 第一阶段是公开,聪明盖任务或素数,个人应在不知不觉中编码进记忆的单词。 第二阶段测试,从总理列表中的单词是混杂在一起与新的单词,以及单词的字母有被重新排序产生的非文字字符串。参与者被要求做出判断字母字符串是否英语单词或不。 在这个实验中,因变量是反应时间,或多少时间流逝从屏幕上的每个单词的外观时参加者使精确的响应。 如果观察到启动效应,参与者中试验在哪里总理的话给出了比试验新单词或炒信介绍了在哪里将更快地响应。 这种性能意味着更快地访问已存储的心理表征。换句话说,引的词都被编码为内隐记忆相比,新型非词。 要进行这项研究,通过生成 30 常见英语名词列表准备刺激。随机将这些词分成相等的三组: 总理的话,新的词汇和置乱的词。 从加扰组单词,通过随机重新排序中产生并不是英语单词的字符串的每个单词的字母创建新颖的 10 个非单词列表。 在准备好字组后, 有参与者坐在电脑。讨论本研究对参与者的总体目标。向他或她看为中心在电脑屏幕上的单词解释和回应通过使按键。 第一阶段暴露,简略地介绍从总理单词列表中为 500 女士指导荧幕上的文字参与者按 Z 键以指示词是有可能被发现在室内或我 ‘ 表明这个词是有可能被发现在户外的关键。 接触阶段之后立即, 启动第二部分,测试阶段。 在这种情况下,随机本总理的话,新的词汇和炒字母混合各 30 试验。指示参与者以快速、 准确地按我 ‘ 关键如果字母组成的字符串,在审判期间是一个词或 Z 键,如果字符串不是一个英语单词。 在测试阶段,记录响应精度和反应时间。 要分析启动对参与者的业绩的影响,跨三组平均反应时间为所有正确的反应: 总理的话、 新词和非词。 绘制由字组的平均时间,通知与会者反应快,当他们提出了与总理的话比较新的单词,和最慢响应非单词时。 既然你已经熟悉设置口头启动任务,让我们看看其他研究人员如何使用技术来探讨内隐记忆过程的神经基础。 最著名的案件之一涉及病人电收尘器,患疱疹脑炎病毒引起的神经损伤。在这种情况下,病毒进入了大脑,给他的内侧颞叶造成大面积破坏。 当口头启动任务,电收尘器进行了测试时,他表现出更快反应听总理的话,就像控制参与者。 这一发现增强记忆可以被离解成不同的子类型的理论。陈述性记忆但左内隐记忆完整的顺行性遗忘症造成的损害。 实验心理学家利用眼动跟踪方法监测参与者如何评价言语刺激。 这种方法集成结果长眼固定对应于更长的反应时间,并且因此而增加的处理要求在大脑中. 啮齿类动物通常是涉及视觉目标识别,类似于口头启动的学习和记忆任务中进行测试。 研究人员检查事先暴露于刺激影响随后的行为和神经活动。这种做法是有必要了解条件启动所在受损,如某些药物口服或创伤性事件。 你刚看了口头吸的朱庇特的简介。现在你应该已经很好地理解如何设计和进行实验,以及分析结果的和适用这一现象。 谢谢观赏 !

Resultados

In general, people take a relatively long time to judge letter strings as non-words. So responses to non-words are longer on average than responses to words.

The crucial result, however, is in the comparison between “New Words” and “Prime Words”: people respond more quickly, on average, to “Prime Words.”

Recall that the “Prime Words” were the ones that appeared in the “Exposure” phase. But the participant was not asked to remember those words at that point, only to judge them as likely to be found indoors or outdoors. In the “Test” phase, participants were not asked if they had seen any of the words before, only whether a string constituted an English word or not. Why would responses to the “Prime Words” be faster than responses to the “New Words” then? When shown incidentally during the “Exposure” phase, those words became encoded into implicit memory. Their mental representations were primed. And so when a word/non-word judgment needed to be made, the participant had faster access to those words, speeding up their responses.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Reaction time for correct responses. The participant responded to “Prime Words”—words that appeared in the “Exposure” phase—more quickly than they did to “New Words.”

Applications and Summary

One place in which implicit memory and priming have long drawn interest is in marketing and advertising. Why do companies like Coca-Cola or McDonalds advertise all the time? Hasn’t everyone heard of them by now? One reason is that they want to prime the public’s memory, to have their brands on people’s minds without people necessarily knowing it. From their perspective, the advertising is worth it if the target audience and their products cross paths coincidentally and priming pushes the audience’s behavior in their direction.

By automatically forming associations to what a person already knows, priming is also thought to play an important role in the ability to comprehend new information and subjects. It is therefore important for researchers to investigate conditions that may impair priming and reduce aptitude. For example, recent research suggests weakened verbal priming as a result of drug abuse, a fact that may account for some of the known cognitive impairments drug use can cause.

Implicit memory is important in trauma and post-traumatic stress. Objects, sounds, and smells in the environment during a traumatic experience can become triggers for stress, anxiety, and even delusion through implicit association with the traumatic experience.

Finally, implicit memory, and priming, in particular, has been an area of interest in studies of memory loss in disorders such as Alzheimer’s. Many types of brain damage seem to impair explicit memory, but not implicit memory. One of the most famous examples of this comes from a patient known as E.P. E.P. suffered from herpes encephalitis, a condition in which the herpes virus enters the brain and causes extensive neural damage. E.P.’s disease destroyed a considerable amount of his medial temporal lobe, an area known to be crucial for the formation of new memories. In E.P, this produced severe anterograde amnesia. However, in a surprising experiment, researchers could show that implicit memory remained intact. When asked explicitly whether he had seen one of the exposure words, E.P. could not remember. Yet he showed faster responses to those words in the priming task, just like control participants.

Transcrição

The use of a verbal priming technique allows for investigation into the nature of implicit memory.

Implicit memory refers to the unconscious impact that past experiences have on human behavior.

Let’s elaborate. If a person regularly sleeps in specific environment, he might feel sleepy if placed in new environment with similar surroundings.

The objects from the sleeping environment prime the individual to respond in a similar manner, even though that person may not remember specific objects in the room.

Through the use of a verbal priming paradigm, this video demonstrates how to design the stimuli and perform the experiment, as well as how to analyze and interpret data investigating implicit memory.

This experiment includes two short phases: an Exposure Phase and a Test Phase. During the Exposure Phase, participants are briefly shown single words from a list, called Prime Words, and asked to identify whether or not the word is found indoors or outdoors.

This first phase is a clever cover task that exposes, or primes, individuals to words that should be unknowingly encoded into memory.

During the second Test Phase, words from the Prime list are intermixed with new words, as well as with words in which the letters have been reordered to produce strings of non-words. Participants are asked to make judgments about whether letter strings are English words or not.

In this experiment, the dependent variable is reaction time, or how much time elapses from the appearance of each word on the screen to when the participant makes an accurate response.

If a priming effect is observed, participants will respond much faster during trials where Prime Words are presented than trials where New Words or Scrambled letters are presented.

Such performance implies faster access to already stored mental representations. In other words, the primed words are encoded into implicit memories compared to novel non-words.

To conduct this study, prepare stimuli by generating a list of 30 common English nouns. Randomly divide these words into three equal groups: Prime Words, New Words, and Words for Scrambling.

From the Words for Scrambling group, create a novel list of 10 non-words by randomly reordering the letters in each word to produce strings that are not English words.

After preparing the word groups, have the participant sit at the computer. Discuss the overall purpose of the study to the participant. Explain to him or her to watch for words centered on the computer screen and respond by making key presses.

During the first Exposure phase, briefly present words from the Prime Words list on the screen for 500 ms. Instruct the participant to press the ‘Z’ key to indicate that the word is likely to be found indoors or the ‘M’ key to indicate that the word is likely to be found outdoors.

Immediately after the Exposure phase, initiate the second part, the Test Phase.

In this case, randomly present the Prime Words, New Words, and Scrambled letters intermixed across the 30 trials. Instruct the participant to quickly and accurately press the ‘M’ key if the letter string during the trial is a word or the ‘Z’ key if the string is not an English word.

During the Test Phase, record response accuracy and reaction time.

To analyze how priming influenced the participant’s performance, average the reaction times for all of the correct responses across the three groups: Prime Words, New Words, and Non-Words.

By graphing the average times by word group, notice that participants responded faster when they were presented with Prime Words compared to New Words, and the slowest when responding to Non-Words.

Now that you are familiar with setting up a verbal priming task, let’s take a look at how other researchers use the technique to investigate the neural underpinnings of implicit memory processes.

One of the most famous cases involves patient E.P., who suffered neural damage caused by the herpes encephalitis virus. In this case, the virus entered the brain and caused extensive damage to his medial temporal lobe.

When E.P. was tested on a verbal priming task, he showed faster responses to Prime words, just like control participants.

The finding reinforced the theory that memories can be dissociated into different sub-types. The damage caused anterograde amnesia for declarative memories but left implicit memories intact.

Experimental psychologists employ eye-tracking methodology to monitor how participants evaluate verbal stimuli.

This method integrates findings that longer eye fixation corresponds to longer reaction times, and thus increased processing demands in the brain.

Rodents are often tested in learning and memory tasks that involve visual object recognition, similar to verbal priming.

Researchers examine whether or not prior exposure to stimuli influences subsequent behavior and neural activity. This approach is valuable to understand conditions where priming is compromised, such as after the administration of certain drugs or traumatic events.

You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to Verbal Priming. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and perform the experiment, as well as analyze results and apply the phenomenon.

Thanks for watching!

Tags

Cite This
JoVE Science Education Database. JoVE Science Education. Verbal Priming. JoVE, Cambridge, MA, (2023).