JoVE Science Education
Developmental Psychology
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Science Education Developmental Psychology
Habituation: Studying Infants Before They Can Talk
  • 00:00Overview
  • 01:13Experimental Design
  • 03:03Running the Experiment
  • 04:59Representative Results
  • 05:46Applications
  • 07:00Summary

习惯: 学习婴儿才可以谈

English

Share

Overview

资料来源: 实验室的尼古拉 Noles、 朱迪思 · Danovitch 和卡拉 Cashon — — 路易斯维尔大学

婴儿是信息的最纯净的来源关于人类思维和学习,因为他们已经很少的生活经验。因此,研究人员感兴趣从婴儿,收集数据,但是作为实验研究的参与者,他们是一个具有挑战性的小组来研究。与不同的大龄儿童和成人,婴幼儿都无法可靠地讲、 理解语音,或甚至移动和控制自己的身体。吃饭、 睡觉,和四处张望是婴儿可以可靠地执行的唯一活动。鉴于这些限制,研究者开发了巧妙的方法探索婴儿的想法。最受欢迎的方法之一,利用注意特征的叫适应。

成人一样,婴儿更喜欢关注新的和有趣的事情。如果他们留在相同的环境,随着时间的推移他们变得习惯于周围的环境,较少注意到他们。这个过程被称为成瘾。然而,新的东西的那一刻发生,婴儿都在等待准备再次集中注意力。注意以下习惯称为去习惯这 reengagement。科学家可以使用这些特性的变化作为一种工具在注意学习思维和学习的婴幼儿。这种方法涉及最初呈现给婴儿的刺激,直到他们习惯,然后与不同种类的刺激来看看是否他们 dishabituate,注意到改变他们提出。研究人员通过仔细选择刺激婴儿所示,可以学到很多关于婴儿如何思考和学习。

本实验演示如何使用习惯研究婴儿形状歧视。

Procedure

招募数量的 6 个月大的婴儿。参与者应身体健康,发育障碍,没有历史和有正常的听力和视力。因为这个年龄的婴儿可以不合作或模糊 (例如,拒绝观看演示或睡在测试过程中),将需要满足的习惯准则,额外参与者需要征聘以获得充分的数据。 1.数据收集 习惯化阶段 在一个安静的房间里放一把椅子在一个大的显示器。 指导家长把宝宝抱并保持尽可能同时看着屏幕上方的中心点的安静。 许多婴儿认知的研究需要父母被蒙上眼睛或装有消噪耳机使某些他们不自觉或不自觉地影响他们婴儿的看的行为。然而,有父磨损的眼罩或头戴式耳机独自可以分神的一个婴儿。因此,一些研究人员只是指导父母不影响她们的婴儿,然后查看视频后要确保没有任何问题的事实。 观察婴儿从另一个房间,使用照相机位于显示器的下方。这架相机聚焦在婴儿的脸上,所以你可以看到是否婴儿看显示器或者远离它,不给婴儿所显示的图像。电影整个试验的婴儿。 习惯化试验中提出的刺激。 第一,以确保婴儿注重每个审判前监视器显示器上,提出了一种注意力的刺激。 当婴儿盯着监视器时,按一个键来呈现刺激的习惯,在这种情况下分配一个蓝色的圆圈。 同时通过按住一个键,跟踪时间记录为每个审判了婴儿的注视时间。如果婴儿看起来移离显示器,释放键。如果婴儿的注意力返回到监视器,然后按下键和刺激仍然在屏幕上。如果宝宝看起来远离显示器上的超过 1.0 s 在任何时间,或寻找审判的最大长度 (20 s),图像将从屏幕上消失和注意力刺激返回。整个实验的两个阶段每个试验重复此过程。 像婴儿一般长期间习惯性几首次试用并大大小于在后来的审判中,习惯于在这一阶段要设置确定如果婴儿的视觉注意不断下降足以被视为标准用的第三个试验。在这种情况下,这是时间回眸三序贯习惯性审判他们平均为 50%或看时间的前三个习惯审判他们平均小于观察时。 继续这一阶段的研究,直到婴儿达到标准的习惯。达到习惯所需的试验次数变化之间的婴儿。 测试阶段 一旦婴儿已习惯,开始测试阶段。这一阶段只不同从习惯化阶段,提出了不同的刺激。 显示婴儿习惯性的刺激,在本例中蓝色的圆圈或一种新的刺激计划 — — 一个蓝色的正方形。为测量婴儿的寻找过程保持不变。 所有的婴儿会看到两个刺激: 平衡测试刺激的演示文稿顺序,一半先看看习惯性刺激,而另一半先看看新奇刺激。 以下测试试验,感谢父母和婴儿参与结束会话。 2.分析 由于视频摄像机的位置,实验者并不知道显示于婴儿皮肤的刺激。如果这不是个案,有两个独立评级机构盲人对刺激所示代码视频录制。另外,很多现代实验室也使用眼动跟踪设备,使他们能够查明到底在哪里婴儿正在试验期间的任何时候。 忽略数据从那些不符合习惯标准的婴儿。 注意因变量,这是多长时间,婴儿花看小说测试刺激相对熟悉熟悉的测试刺激。

Results

In order to have enough power to see significant results, researchers need to test at least 16 infants, not including infants dropped from the study for failing to habituate, fussiness, falling asleep, parent interference, etc.. Infants who have habituated are expected to show low levels of looking when shown the habituation stimulus during test. If infants look longer at the novel test stimulus in comparison to the habituation test stimulus after they have habituated (Figure 1), researchers would conclude that infants discriminated the stimuli. Good test stimuli are well controlled and as similar to habituation trials as possible, with the exception of the key variable being manipulated, in this case shape.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Average looking time across infants during habituation and test phases. The habituation stimulus is identical to the items seen during habituation, resulting in very low looking times. Infants dishabituate, or look longer, at the novel test stimulus in comparison to the habituation stimulus, if they notice the different shape.

Applications and Summary

Other senses can also be tested using these same methods. For example, it is possible to measure infants’ habituation and dishabituation to auditory stimuli using pacifiers designed to measure the rate and strength of their sucking. Attentive babies suck more often and harder than babies who are habituated, so the same methods can be applied using different approaches.

Habituation methods are both powerful and limited in specific ways. When infants dishabituate, experimenters can conclude that they noticed some difference between familiar and novel test items, but it takes careful experimental design to draw conclusions from work with infants. Working with infants also creates special challenges. Most scientists do not have to worry about their participants needing a nap or diaper change during their study. However, habituation methods can be a powerful tool for studying participants unable to communicate. This approach is especially valuable to developmental scientists who are interested in studying abilities that humans are born with, as well as those that develop with very few life experiences.

Habituation methods are also used to study much more complex topics, such as the development of concepts of race, gender, and fairness. For example, by presenting infants with faces belonging to different racial groups, researchers discovered that 3-month-old babies identify new and old faces independent of race.1 However, between 6- and 9-months of age, infants undergo perceptual narrowing, after which they are more adept at recognizing individuals in their own racial group, but they find it difficult to discriminate between faces belonging to other racial groups. Thus, habituation methods represent a powerful tool for studying infant cognition and human development.

References

  1. Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Ge, L., & Pascalis, O. The other-race effect develops during infancy: Evidence of perceptual narrowing. Psychological Science. 18 (12), 1084-1089 (2007).

Transcript

To explore the early stages of conceptual development—when infants are unable to reliably speak, understand speech, or precisely control movements—researchers have established clever techniques that use habituation methods.

Like adults, infants prefer to pay attention to new and interesting things. If left in the same environment, over time they become accustomed to their surroundings and pay less attention to them. This process is called habituation.

However, the moment something new happens, infants are ready to pay attention again. Such reengagement of attention following habituation is referred to as dishabituation.

Scientists can use these characteristic changes in attention as a tool for studying the thinking and learning processes of young infants.

This video demonstrates how to design and execute an infant habituation paradigm, as well as how to analyze and interpret results for investigating their shape discrimination.

In this experiment, six-month-old infants are exposed to different shape stimuli in two phases, thus using a within-subjects design to compare whether or not habituation towards one shape persists and dishabituation occurs with the presentation of a new shape.

In the initial phase, infants are shown stimuli on a video monitor: first an “attention-getter”—an image that moves and makes sounds to direct their attention—followed by a shape stimulus, such as a blue circle.

In this case, the dependent variable measured is the time that the infants spend looking at the shape stimulus. Because they (typically) spend more time looking during the first three trials, these times are averaged as the baseline time.

The habituation phase is continued until the infant’s time spent looking at the stimulus is 50% or less than baseline for three sequential trials. Thus, the number of trials required to reach habituation may vary between babies.

Once habituation is reached, the test phase is started, and only two trials are presented in a counterbalanced manner; that is, infants are again shown the attention-getter to start, after which, half will first see the familiar blue circle that was shown during the habituation phase, and the other half will start with a novel blue square.

When babies are presented with the familiar shape, they are predicted to remain habituated—their looking times will remain relatively unchanged. However, during the presentation of a novel stimulus, babies are expected to dishabituate—they will re-engage their attention and look longer when they detect a change.

Before the infant and parent arrive, prepare a quiet testing room by placing a comfortable chair in front of a large monitor equipped with a video camera.

Upon arrival, greet the infant and parent. Instruct the parent to hold their infant and remain as quiet as possible while looking at a point just below the center of the screen.

From another room, monitor the infant using the video feed from the camera. Initiate the software that controls stimuli presentation and records looking times. Note that in this view, you can only see whether the infant is looking at or away from the monitor and not what appears on their screen.

When the infant is looking at the monitor, press the ‘5’ key, which is assigned to log looking times. Notice that the program first displays a stimulus on the infant’s screen to capture their attention, followed by the blue circle.

As soon as the infant looks away for more than 1 s, release the timing key—automatically ending the trial—or, when they look at the screen for the maximum duration of 20 s.

After three trials, examine the baseline time—the calculated average looking time across these trials. Repeat trials until the infant reaches criterion for habituation. Remember that the number of trials required might vary across infants.

Once criterion has been reached, automatically proceed to the test phase that now includes a novel blue square in one of the two trials—counterbalanced across infants.

Following the test phase, end the session by thanking the parent and infant for participating.

To analyze the results, graph the mean looking times for all of the infants who met criterion during the habituation phase, and for the test phase, by stimulus shape—the familiar blue circle and novel blue square.

Over the course of the habituation trials, the average looking time decreased to be approximately half as long in duration.

When infants saw a new stimulus during the test phase—the blue square—they showed the hallmark signs of dishabituation. Notably, their looking times increased relative to the familiar test stimulus, suggesting that they noticed the new shape.

Now that you are familiar with the habituation methods used as a tool designed to study infant shape discrimination, let’s look at other ways that developmental psychologists use the paradigm.

Researchers can examine other sensory modalities. For example, it is possible to measure infants’ habituation and dishabituation to auditory stimuli using specially designed pacifiers that gage the rate and strength of their sucking. Attentive babies suck more often and harder than babies who are habituated.

Habituation is also used to study more complex topics, such as the development of concepts of race, gender, and fairness. For instance, by presenting infants with faces belonging to different racial groups, researchers discovered that 3-month-old babies identified new and old faces independent of race.

However, between 6- and 9-months of age, infants undergo perceptual narrowing, making them more adept at recognizing individuals in their own racial group, and less able to discriminate between faces belonging to other racial groups.

You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to examining habituation methods in infants. Now you should have a good understanding of how to setup and perform the experiment, as well as analyze and assess the results.

Thanks for watching!

Tags

Cite This
JoVE Science Education Database. JoVE Science Education. Habituation: Studying Infants Before They Can Talk. JoVE, Cambridge, MA, (2023).