Summary

Correlating के मानव prefrontal प्रांतस्था से fMRI सिग्नल व्यवहार प्रतिक्रियाएँ: संज्ञानात्मक प्रक्रियाओं की जांच कार्य विश्लेषण का उपयोग

Published: June 20, 2012
doi:

Summary

हमारे शोध के लक्ष्य के व्यवहार के लिए मस्तिष्क गतिविधि के लिए सहसंबंधी है. सही व्यवहार उपायों और इमेजिंग तकनीक हमें मस्तिष्क व्यवहार रिश्तों को स्पष्ट करने के लिए अनुमति देते हैं.

Abstract

The aim of this methods paper is to describe how to implement a neuroimaging technique to examine complementary brain processes engaged by two similar tasks. Participants’ behavior during task performance in an fMRI scanner can then be correlated to the brain activity using the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal. We measure behavior to be able to sort correct trials, where the subject performed the task correctly and then be able to examine the brain signals related to correct performance. Conversely, if subjects do not perform the task correctly, and these trials are included in the same analysis with the correct trials we would introduce trials that were not only for correct performance. Thus, in many cases these errors can be used themselves to then correlate brain activity to them. We describe two complementary tasks that are used in our lab to examine the brain during suppression of an automatic responses: the stroop1 and anti-saccade tasks. The emotional stroop paradigm instructs participants to either report the superimposed emotional ‘word’ across the affective faces or the facial ‘expressions’ of the face stimuli1,2. When the word and the facial expression refer to different emotions, a conflict between what must be said and what is automatically read occurs. The participant has to resolve the conflict between two simultaneously competing processes of word reading and facial expression. Our urge to read out a word leads to strong ‘stimulus-response (SR)’ associations; hence inhibiting these strong SR’s is difficult and participants are prone to making errors. Overcoming this conflict and directing attention away from the face or the word requires the subject to inhibit bottom up processes which typically directs attention to the more salient stimulus. Similarly, in the anti-saccade task3,4,5,6, where an instruction cue is used to direct only attention to a peripheral stimulus location but then the eye movement is made to the mirror opposite position. Yet again we measure behavior by recording the eye movements of participants which allows for the sorting of the behavioral responses into correct and error trials7 which then can be correlated to brain activity. Neuroimaging now allows researchers to measure different behaviors of correct and error trials that are indicative of different cognitive processes and pinpoint the different neural networks involved.

Protocol

1. एमआरआई कक्ष में प्रवेश करने से पहले प्रतिभागियों को एक सहमति सभी प्रयोगात्मक (जैसे पेसमेकर, क्लौस्ट्रफ़ोबिया, धातु प्रत्यारोपण, गर्भावस्था का मौका, आदि), जोखिम और उनकी भागीदारी का लाभ समझा फार्म …

Discussion

आदेश में काम करने के लिए संबंधित सक्रियण के एक नक्शे उत्पादन, मस्तिष्क क्षेत्रों की पहचान (या विरोधी saccade बनाम समर्थक saccade या तो Stroop में यानी, incongruent बनाम अनुकूल भावना और चेहरे की अभिव्यक्ति) स्कैन कार्यों के ?…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

राष्ट्रीय विज्ञान एवं इंजीनियरिंग अनुसंधान परिषद (NSERC) JFXD, स्वास्थ्य, न्यूयॉर्क विश्वविद्यालय और लेखक के संकाय द्वारा वित्त पोषित अतः ओंटारियो समस्या जुआ रिसर्च सेंटर (OPGRC) द्वारा पीएचडी धन है.

Materials

Name of Equipment Company
3-Tesla MRI machine Siemens Magnetom Trio (Erlangen, Germany)
iViewX Eye Tracking SensoMotoric Instruments, Inc.
BrainVoyager QX software Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Four-button Joystick Current Designs, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA

Table 1. Specific Reagents and Equipment.

References

  1. Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18, 643-662 (1935).
  2. Ovaysikia, S., Tahir, K. A., Chan, J. L., DeSouza, J. F. X. Word wins over face: emotional Stroop effect activates the frontal cortical network. Front Hum. Neurosci. 4, 234 (2011).
  3. Hallett, P. E. Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Res. 18, 1279-1296 (1978).
  4. Connolly, J. D., Goodale, M. A., DeSouza, J. F. X., Menon, R. S., Vilis, T. A comparison of frontoparietal fMRI activation during anti-saccades and anti-pointing. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 1645-1655 (2000).
  5. DeSouza, J. F. X., Menon, R. S., Everling, S. Preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in humans investigated with event-related FMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 1016-1023 (2003).
  6. Everling, S., DeSouza, J. F. X. Rule-dependent activity for prosaccades and antisaccades in the primate prefrontal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1483-1496 (2005).
  7. Ford, K. A., Goltz, H. C., Brown, M. R. G., Everling, S. Neural processes associated with antisaccade task performance investigated with event-related fMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 429-440 (2005).
  8. DeSouza, J. F. X., Nicolle, D. A., Vilis, T. Task-dependent changes in the shape and thickness of Listing’s plane. Vision Res. 37, 2271-2282 (1997).
  9. Hadjikhani, N. Mechanisms of migraine aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4687-4692 (2001).
  10. DeSouza, J. F. X. Eye position signal modulates a human parietal pointing region during memory-guided movements. J. Neurosci. 20, 5835-5840 (2000).
check_url/3237?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
DeSouza, J. F., Ovaysikia, S., Pynn, L. K. Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis. J. Vis. Exp. (64), e3237, doi:10.3791/3237 (2012).

View Video