Summary

Endothelialized على microfluidics لدراسة التفاعلات الاوعية الدموية الدقيقة في الأمراض الدموية

Published: June 22, 2012
doi:

Summary

A method to culture an endothelial cell monolayer throughout the entire inner 3D surface of a microfluidic device with microvascular-sized channels (<30 μm) is described. This in vitro microvasculature model enables the study of biophysical interactions between blood cells, endothelial cells, and soluble factors in hematologic diseases.

Abstract

Advances in microfabrication techniques have enabled the production of inexpensive and reproducible microfluidic systems for conducting biological and biochemical experiments at the micro- and nanoscales 1,2. In addition, microfluidics have also been specifically used to quantitatively analyze hematologic and microvascular processes, because of their ability to easily control the dynamic fluidic environment and biological conditions3-6. As such, researchers have more recently used microfluidic systems to study blood cell deformability, blood cell aggregation, microvascular blood flow, and blood cell-endothelial cell interactions6-13.However, these microfluidic systems either did not include cultured endothelial cells or were larger than the sizescale relevant to microvascular pathologic processes. A microfluidic platform with cultured endothelial cells that accurately recapitulates the cellular, physical, and hemodynamic environment of the microcirculation is needed to further our understanding of the underlying biophysical pathophysiology of hematologic diseases that involve the microvasculature.

Here, we report a method to create an “endothelialized” in vitro model of the microvasculature, using a simple, single mask microfabrication process in conjunction with standard endothelial cell culture techniques, to study pathologic biophysical microvascular interactions that occur in hematologic disease. This “microvasculature-on-a-chip” provides the researcher with a robust assay that tightly controls biological as well as biophysical conditions and is operated using a standard syringe pump and brightfield/fluorescence microscopy. Parameters such as microcirculatory hemodynamic conditions, endothelial cell type, blood cell type(s) and concentration(s), drug/inhibitory concentration etc., can all be easily controlled. As such, our microsystem provides a method to quantitatively investigate disease processes in which microvascular flow is impaired due to alterations in cell adhesion, aggregation, and deformability, a capability unavailable with existing assays.

Protocol

1. Fabrication of the Endothelial Microdevice Create a photomask by submitting a computer assisted design (CAD) drawing of the microfluidic device to an outside mask vendor. The mask used was composed of a chrome layer on soda lime glass. In this case the microfluidic channel width was 30 μm. Clean a bare silicon wafer with piranha (10:1 ratio of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide) for 15 minutes and dip in hydrofluoric acid for 30 seconds. Rinse with deionized (DI) water for approxima…

Discussion

Our endothelialized microdevice system is best suited when used in conjunction with in vivo experiments, and its reductionist approach may help elucidate the biophysical mechanisms of hematologic processes that are observed in humans and animal models. Furthermore, our system is not without limitations. For instance, our microfluidic channels are square in cross-section. Although technically circular microchannels can be fabricated10,11, we opted to use a more simplified and standard fabricatio…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Hunt, M. Rosenbluth, and the Lam Lab for their advice and useful discussions. We acknowledge the support from G. Spinner and the Institute for Electronics and Nanotechnology at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Financial support for this work was provided by an NIH grant K08-HL093360, UCSF REAC award, an NIH Nanomedicine Development Center Award PN2EY018244, and funding from the Center for Endothelial Cell Biology of Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta.

Materials

Name of the reagent Company Catalogue number Comments
blunt point needle OK International 920050-TE Precision TE needle 20 Gauge x 1/2″, pink
dextran Sigma-Aldrich 31392  
Fibronectin Sigma-Aldrich F0895  
Hole puncher (pin vise) Technical Innovations    
Human umbilical cord endothelial cells (HUVECs) Lonza CC-2519  
Plasma cleaner Plasma PDC-326  
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Fisher Scientific NC9285739 Sylgard 184 Silicone Elastomer KIT
Sigmacote Sigma-Aldrich SL2  
SU-8 2025 Microchem Y111069  
SU-8 Developer Microchem Y020100  
Syringe pump Harvard Apparatus 70-3008 PHD-ULTRA
tubing(larger) Cole-Parmer Instrument Company 06418-02 Tygonreg microbore tubing, 0.020″ ID x 0.060″ OD
tubing(smaller) Cole-Parmer Instrument Company 06417-11 PTFE microbore tubing, 0.012″ ID x 0.030″ OD

References

  1. Mezzano, D., Quiroga, T., Pereira, J. The Level of Laboratory Testing Required for Diagnosis or Exclusion of a Platelet Function Disorder Using Platelet Aggregation and Secretion Assays. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 35, 242-254 (2009).
  2. Young, E. W. K., Beebe, D. J. Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments. Chemical Society Reviews. 39, 1036-1048 (2010).
  3. Young, E. W. K., Simmons, C. A. Macro- microscale fluid flow systems for endothelial cell biology. Lab on a Chip. 10, 143-160 (2010).
  4. Higgins, J. M., Eddington, D. T., Bhatia, S. N., Mahadevan, L. Sickle cell vasoocclusion and rescue in a microfluidic device. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104, 20496-20500 (2007).
  5. Rosano, J. A physiologically realistic in vitro model of microvascular networks. Biomedical Microdevices. 11, 1051-1057 (2009).
  6. Meer, A. D. v. a. n. d. e. r., Poot, A. A., Duits, M. H. G., Feijen, J., Vermes, I. Microfluidic Technology in Vascular Research. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2009, (2009).
  7. Karunarathne, W., Ku, C. -. J., Spence, D. M. The dual nature of extracellular ATP as a concentration-dependent platelet P2X1 agonist and antagonist. Integrative Biology. 1, 655-663 (2009).
  8. Kotz, K. T. Clinical microfluidics for neutrophil genomics and proteomics. Nat. Med. 16, 1042-1047 (2010).
  9. Rosenbluth, M. J., Lam, W. A., Fletcher, D. A. Analyzing cell mechanics in hematologic diseases with microfluidic biophysical flow cytometry. Lab on a Chip. 8, 1062-1070 (2008).
  10. Shelby, J. P., White, J., Ganesan, K., Rathod, P. K., Chiu, D. T. A microfluidic model for single-cell capillary obstruction by Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100, 14618-14622 (1073).
  11. Borenstein, J. Functional endothelialized microvascular networks with circular cross-sections in a tissue culture substrate. Biomedical Microdevices. 12, 71-79 (2010).
  12. Nesbitt, W. S. A shear gradient-dependent platelet aggregation mechanism drives thrombus formation. Nat. Med. 15, 665-673 (2009).
  13. Prabhakarpandian, B., Shen, M. -. C., Pant, K., Kiani, M. F. Microfluidic devices for modeling cell-cell and particle-cell interactions in the microvasculature. Microvascular Research. 82, 210-220 (2011).
  14. Tsai, M. In vitro modeling of the microvascular occlusion and thrombosis that occur in hematologic diseases using microfluidic technology. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. , (2011).
  15. Green, D. A., Murphy, W. G., Uttley, W. S. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome: prognostic factors. Clinical & Laboratory Haematology. 22, 11-14 (2000).
check_url/3958?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Myers, D. R., Sakurai, Y., Tran, R., Ahn, B., Hardy, E. T., Mannino, R., Kita, A., Tsai, M., Lam, W. A. Endothelialized Microfluidics for Studying Microvascular Interactions in Hematologic Diseases. J. Vis. Exp. (64), e3958, doi:10.3791/3958 (2012).

View Video