A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

5.9K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/55650

⸱

April 18th, 2017

 , 

In This Article

Summary

This protocol was designed to test the activation and pursuit of cognitive goals (e.g., an abstract thinking goal) using the task interruption and resumption paradigm. The protocol is suitable for cognitive goals that are automatically pursued once activated, as the distraction procedure prevents goal pursuit during the interruption period.

Abstract

This protocol is based on the task interruption and resumption paradigm, the premise of which is that active goals lead to persistent behavior and thus a higher resumption rate after a period of delay or interruption. The task interruption and resumption protocol described in this research is tailored to test the activation of cognitive goals (e.g., a goal to think more abstractly). Cognitive goals may be pursued even during the interruption period; thus, to prevent this, the protocol involves cognitive distraction. The protocol consists of several stages. Specifically, the initial stage includes the goal activation process, where the treatment (versus control) condition receives a manipulation to activate the cognitive goal being tested by the researcher. In the next stage, participants are presented with the introduction of a task that is perceived to either satisfy or not satisfy the cognitive goal of interest. Importantly, this task is interrupted a few seconds after it begins. The task interruption forces a delay period and introduces a cognitive distraction to prevent the automatic pursuit and fulfillment of the cognitive goal. After the interruption period, participants are given a choice between resuming the interrupted task and abandoning the interrupted task to complete an alternative task instead. Among participants whose cognitive goals had been activated at the earlier stage, the task resumption rate should be higher if the task was perceived as an opportunity to satisfy (versus not satisfy) the goal. Such a finding would provide empirical evidence that the cognitive goal has been activated and pursued. In previous research, this protocol has been used to test whether causal uncertainty activates an abstract thinking goal. Adapting the protocol to test the activation of other cognitive goals is also discussed.

Introduction

Goal pursuit can take many forms, from educational attainment to healthy diets to finding happiness. Much research on goal pursuit investigates factors that moderate motivation levels or goal commitment1,2,3,4,5, while others focus on examining the consequences of active goals6,7,8,9,10. The methodology described and discussed in the current pape....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This research was approved with a full waiver of informed consent by the University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review Board (IRB 2011-02-0021).

1. Beginning and Introducing the Session

  1. Ask participants to begin the session online.
    NOTE: The session can take place in a lab or on participants' own computers (desktop or laptop) outside the lab. The study requires a digital survey platform that has a time-based automatic proceeding feature (e.g., Qualtrics).
  2. Ask participants to read basic descriptions of the overall survey procedure (e.g., expected duration, required survey-taking device, and a....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The above method was implemented by Namkoong and Henderson11 in their first study, which consisted of two data sets. The two data sets were combined for the analysis because the pattern of results was consistent across both. Participants were 297 college students from two different public universities (168 females; age range 17 to 48 years, mean (M) age = 20.43 years, standard deviation (SD) = 3.78 years), and they completed the survey in exchange.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The methodology detailed in this paper allows researchers to test the activation and pursuit of a cognitive goal in a simple and economical way. It is especially suitable for automatic cognitive goals because automatic goal pursuit is more efficient29, and the typing interruption (i.e., the "Natural Typing Task") prevents goals from being fulfilled through unconscious cognitive processes. Cognitive goals that are activated outside of participants' awareness are also less susce.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors have no acknowledgements.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
ComputerN/AN/AThe survey requires a computer and cannot be implemented using a paper-and-pencil format.
Qualtrics Insight PlatformQualtricsN/AQualtrics is only one example. Both online and offline survey platforms are appropriate as long as a time-based automatic proceeding feature is available.
IBM SPSS StatisticsIBM CorporationN/AOther statistical software may be used.

References

  1. Amir, O., Ariely, D. Resting on laurels: The effects of discrete progress markers as subgoals on task performance and preferences. J. Exp. Psychol.-Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34 (5), 1158-1171 (2008).
  2. Koo, M., Fishbach, A.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Task Interruption ParadigmCognitive Goal ActivationTask Resumption RateCausal Uncertainty ManipulationPicture Impression TaskNatural Typing TaskRelationship Conflict TaskHumor Evaluation TaskGoal Pursuit Measurement