Summary

Immunofluorescence Microscopy of γH2AX and 53BP1 for Analyzing the Formation and Repair of DNA Double-strand Breaks

Published: November 03, 2017
doi:

Summary

This manuscript provides a protocol for the analysis of DNA double-strand breaks by immunofluorescence microscopy of γH2AX and 53BP1.

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are serious DNA lesions. Analysis of the formation and repair of DSB is relevant in a broad spectrum of research areas including genome integrity, genotoxicity, radiation biology, aging, cancer, and drug development. In response to DSB, the histone H2AX is phosphorylated at Serine 139 in a region of several megabase pairs forming discrete nuclear foci detectable by immunofluorescence microscopy. In addition, 53BP1 (p53 binding protein 1) is another important DSB-responsive protein promoting repair of DSB by nonhomologous end-joining while preventing homologous recombination. According to the specific functions of γH2AX and 53BP1, the combined analysis of γH2AX and 53BP1 by immunofluorescence microscopy may be a reasonable approach for a detailed analysis of DSB. This manuscript provides a step-by-step protocol supplemented with methodical notes for performing the technique. Specifically, the influence of the cell cycle on γH2AX foci patterns is demonstrated in normal fibroblasts of the cell line NHDF. Further, the value of the γH2AX foci as a biomarker is depicted in x-ray irradiated lymphocytes of a healthy individual. Finally, genetic instability is investigated in CD34+ cells of a patient with acute myeloid leukemia by immunofluorescence microscopy of γH2AX and 53BP1.

Introduction

DNA is continuously damaged by endogenous (e.g., replication stress, reactive oxygen species, intrinsic instability of DNA) and exogenous (e.g., chemical radicals, irradiation) sources (Figure 1)1,2,3,4. Among DNA damage, DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are particularly serious lesions and may induce cell death or carcinogenesis. About 50 DSB may arise per cell and cell cycle5. In mammalian cells, homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) developed as major pathways for the repair of DSB (Figure 2). HR occurs in late S/G2 phase and uses an intact sister chromatid as a template for potentially error-free repair. In comparison, NHEJ is active throughout the cell cycle and potentially mutagenic as base pairs may be added or resected before ligation of the broken ends. In addition, alternative end-joining may be engaged as a slow mutagenic back-up repair mechanism in case of NHEJ deficiency6,7.

DSB induce the phosphorylation of the histone H2AX at Serine 139 in a region of several megabase pairs around each DSB. The forming nuclear foci are named γH2AX foci and are detectable by immunofluorescence microscopy8. γH2AX promotes the recruitment of further DSB-responsive proteins and is involved in chromatin remodeling, DNA repair, and signal transduction9. As each γH2AX focus is considered to represent a single DSB, the quantification of DSB by immunofluorescence microscopy is possible, which has been demonstrated in cancer cell lines and patient specimens10,11,12,13,14. 53BP1 (p53 binding protein 1) is another key protein in mediating DSB repair. It is involved in the recruitment of DSB-responsive proteins, checkpoint signaling, and the synapsis of DSB ends15. In addition, 53BP1 plays a critical role in the DSB repair pathway choice. It triggers the repair of DSB towards NHEJ while HR is prevented16. Considering the genuine functions of γH2AX and 53BP1 in DSB repair, the simultaneous analysis of γH2AX and 53BP1 by immunofluorescence microscopy may be a useful method for the precise analysis of the formation and repair of DSB.

This manuscript provides a step-by-step protocol for performing immunofluorescence microscopy of γH2AX and 53BP1 in cell nuclei. Specifically, the technique is applied in normal fibroblasts of the cell line NHDF, in x-ray irradiated lymphocytes of a healthy individual and in CD34+ cells of a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. The details of the method are pointed out in the context of the presented results.

Protocol

All methods described here have been approved by the Ethics Committee II of the Medical Faculty Mannheim of the Heidelberg University. Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals. 1. Preparation of Materials Anticoagulant stock solution: Prepare an anticoagulant stock solution of 200 I.U. heparin per mL in 0.9% sodium chloride. Fill each of the collection tubes (draw volume 9 mL) with 2 mL of the anticoagulant stock solution before withdrawal of the …

Representative Results

Analysis of γH2AX foci in cells is most accurate in the G0/G1 phase and the G2 phase when γH2AX foci appear as distinct fluorescent dots (Figure 5A). In contrast, analysis of γH2AX foci in cells during the S phase is complicated by dispersed pan-nuclear γH2AX speckles caused by the replication process (Figure 5B). Fixation of the cells was performed …

Discussion

Immunofluorescence microscopy of γH2AX and 53BP1 is a useful method for analyzing formation and repair of DSB in a broad spectrum of research areas. Critical parameters that influence the outcome of the experiments are the phase of the cell cycle, the agents used for the fixation and permeabilization of the cells, the choice of the antibodies, and the hardware and software of the fluorescence microscope.

The influence of the cell cycle on γH2AX foci patterns was demonstrated by expon…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by the German José Carreras Leukemia Foundation (DJCLS 14 R/2017).

Materials

RPMI medium Sigma-Aldrich R0883 Medium for cell culture
Heparin sodium ratiopharm PZN 3029843  Heparin 5,000 I.U. / mL
Sodium chloride solution 0.9% B. Braun PZN 1957154 Component of the anticoagulant stock solution
Ficoll-Paque Premium GE Healthcare 17-5442-02 Medium for isolation of mononuclear cells
Trypsin solution 10X Sigma-Aldrich 59427C Enzyme for dissociation of fibroblasts in cell culture
CD34 MicroBead Kit Miltenyi Biotec 130-046-702 Isolation of CD34+ myeloid progenitor cells
Diagnostic microscope slides Thermo Scientific ER-203B-CE24 Microscope slides
Megafuge 1.0 R Heraeus 75003060  Tabletop centrifuge 
Cytospin device
Lid Heraeus 76003422 Lid for working without micro-tubes
Cyto container Heraeus 75003416 Cyto container with 2 conical bores
Clip carrier Heraeus 75003414 Carrier for holding a cyto container and a slide
Support insert Heraeus 75003417 Support insert for holding a clip carrier
Triton X-100 (Octoxinol 9) Thermo Scientific 85112 Detergent for permeabilization of cell membranes
Potassium hydroxide solution 1M Merck Millipore 109107 Necessary for preparing the paraformaldehyde solution
Paraformaldehyde Sigma-Aldrich P6148 Fixation agent
Phosphate buffered saline Sigma-Aldrich D8537 Balanced salt solution
Chemiblocker Merck Millipore 2170 Blocking agent
Mouse monoclonal anti-γH2AX antibody (JBW301) Merck Millipore 05-636 Primary antibody for detection of γH2AX
Polyclonal rabbit anti-53BP1 antibody (NB100-304) Novus Biologicals NB100-304 Primary antibody for detection of 53BP1
Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody Invitrogen A-11001 Secondary antibody
Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody Invitrogen A-21428 Secondary antibody
Vectashield mounting medium Vector Laboratories H-1200 Contains DAPI for staining of DNA
Axio Scope.A1 Zeiss 490035 Fluorescence microscope
Cool Cube 1 CCD camera Metasystems H-0310-010-MS Camera system for digital recording
Isis software Metasystems Not applicable Microscope software

References

  1. Hoeijmakers, J. H. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature. 411 (6835), 366-374 (2001).
  2. Lindahl, T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature. 362 (6422), 709-715 (1993).
  3. Zeman, M. K., Cimprich, K. A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat Cell Biol. 16 (1), 2-9 (2014).
  4. . Biological effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: A fuller picture Available from: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/36405843745.pdf (1994)
  5. Vilenchik, M. M., Knudson, A. G. Endogenous DNA double-strand breaks: production, fidelity of repair, and induction of cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100 (22), 12871-12876 (2003).
  6. Simsek, D., Jasin, M. Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4-ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 17 (4), 410-416 (2010).
  7. Weinstock, D. M., Brunet, E., Jasin, M. Formation of NHEJ-derived reciprocal chromosomal translocations does not require Ku70. Nat Cell Biol. 9 (8), 978-981 (2007).
  8. Rogakou, E. P., Pilch, D. R., Orr, A. H., Ivanova, V. S., Bonner, W. M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 273 (10), 5858-5868 (1998).
  9. Scully, R., Xie, A. Double strand break repair functions of histone H2AX. Mutat Res. 750 (1-2), 5-14 (2013).
  10. Walters, D. K., et al. Evidence for ongoing DNA damage in multiple myeloma cells as revealed by constitutive phosphorylation of H2AX. Leukemia. 25 (8), 1344-1353 (2011).
  11. Yu, T., MacPhail, S. H., Banath, J. P., Klokov, D., Olive, P. L. Endogenous expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX in tumors in relation to DNA double-strand breaks and genomic instability. DNA Repair (Amst). 5 (8), 935-946 (2006).
  12. Sedelnikova, O. A., Bonner, W. M. GammaH2AX in cancer cells: a potential biomarker for cancer diagnostics, prediction and recurrence. Cell Cycle. 5 (24), 2909-2913 (2006).
  13. Chen, E., et al. JAK2V617F promotes replication fork stalling with disease-restricted impairment of the intra-S checkpoint response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111 (42), 15190-15195 (2014).
  14. Popp, H. D., et al. Increase of DNA damage and alteration of the DNA damage response in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias. Leuk Res. 57, 112-118 (2017).
  15. Panier, S., Boulton, S. J. Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 15 (1), 7-18 (2014).
  16. Escribano-Diaz, C., et al. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol Cell. 49 (5), 872-883 (2013).
  17. Boyum, A. Separation of White Blood Cells. Nature. 204, 793-794 (1964).
  18. Boyum, A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 97, 77-89 (1968).
  19. Bain, B., Pshyk, K. Enhanced reactivity in mixed leukocyte cultures after separation of mononuclear cells on Ficoll-Hypaque. Transplant Proc. 4 (2), 163-164 (1972).
  20. Popp, H. D., et al. Leukocyte DNA damage after reduced and conventional absorbed radiation doses using 3rd generation dual-source CT technology. Eur J Radiol Open. 3, 134-137 (2016).
  21. Rothkamm, K., Balroop, S., Shekhdar, J., Fernie, P., Goh, V. Leukocyte DNA damage after multi-detector row CT: a quantitative biomarker of low-level radiation exposure. Radiology. 242 (1), 244-251 (2007).
  22. Lobrich, M., et al. In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102 (25), 8984-8989 (2005).
  23. Jamur, M. C., Oliver, C. Cell fixatives for immunostaining. Methods Mol Biol. 588, 55-61 (2010).
  24. Jamur, M. C., Oliver, C. Permeabilization of cell membranes. Methods Mol Biol. 588, 63-66 (2010).
  25. Rothkamm, K., Lobrich, M. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100 (9), 5057-5062 (2003).
check_url/56617?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Popp, H. D., Brendel, S., Hofmann, W., Fabarius, A. Immunofluorescence Microscopy of γH2AX and 53BP1 for Analyzing the Formation and Repair of DNA Double-strand Breaks. J. Vis. Exp. (129), e56617, doi:10.3791/56617 (2017).

View Video