Summary

Minimally Invasive Murine Laryngoscopy for Close-Up Imaging of Laryngeal Motion During Breathing and Swallowing

Published: December 01, 2023
doi:

Summary

This protocol describes a serial transoral laryngoscopy approach for mice and rats that permits close-up, unobstructed video imaging of the larynx during breathing and swallowing using an optimized anesthetic regimen and finely tuned endoscopic manipulation techniques.

Abstract

The larynx is an essential organ in mammals with three primary functions – breathing, swallowing, and vocalizing. A wide range of disorders are known to impair laryngeal function, which results in difficulty breathing (dyspnea), swallowing impairment (dysphagia), and/or voice impairment (dysphonia). Dysphagia, in particular, can lead to aspiration pneumonia and associated morbidity, recurrent hospitalization, and early mortality. Despite these serious consequences, existing treatments for laryngeal dysfunction are largely aimed at surgical and behavioral interventions that unfortunately do not typically restore normal laryngeal function, thus highlighting the urgent need for innovative solutions.

To bridge this gap, we have been developing an experimental endoscopic approach to investigate laryngeal dysfunction in murine (i.e., mouse and rat) models. However, endoscopy in rodents is quite challenging due to their small size relative to current endoscope technology, anatomical differences in the upper airway, and the necessity for anesthesia to optimally access the larynx. Here, we describe a novel transoral laryngoscopy approach that permits close-up, unobstructed video imaging of laryngeal motion in mice and rats. Critical steps in the protocol include precise anesthesia management (to prevent overdosing that abolishes swallowing and/or risks respiratory distress-related mortality) and micromanipulator control of the endoscope (for stable video recording of laryngeal motion by a single researcher for subsequent quantification).

Importantly, the protocol can be performed over time in the same animals to study the impact of various pathological conditions specifically on laryngeal function. A novel advantage of this protocol is the ability to visualize airway protection during swallowing, which is not possible in humans due to epiglottic inversion over the laryngeal inlet that obstructs the glottis from view. Rodents therefore provide a unique opportunity to specifically investigate the mechanisms of normal versus pathological laryngeal airway protection for the ultimate purpose of discovering treatments to effectively restore normal laryngeal function.

Introduction

The larynx is a cartilaginous organ located at the intersection of the respiratory and digestive tracts in the throat, where it functions as a valving mechanism to precisely control the flow and direction of air (i.e., during breathing and vocalizing) versus food and liquid (i.e., during swallowing). A wide range of disorders are known to affect the larynx, including congenital (e.g., laryngomalacia, subglottic stenosis), neoplastic (e.g., laryngeal papillomatosis, squamous cell carcinoma), neurological (e.g., idiopathic laryngeal paralysis, stroke, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), and iatrogenic (e.g., inadvertent injury during head or neck surgery). Regardless of the etiology, laryngeal dysfunction typically results in a symptom triad of dyspnea (difficulty breathing), dysphonia (voice impairment), and dysphagia (swallowing impairment) that negatively impact a person's economic and social welfare1,2,3,4.

Moreover, dysphagia, particularly in medically fragile individuals, can lead to aspiration pneumonia (due to food or liquid escaping through an incompletely closed larynx into the lungs) and associated morbidity, recurrent hospitalization, and early mortality5,6. Despite these serious consequences, existing treatments for laryngeal dysfunction are largely aimed at surgical and behavioral interventions that do not typically restore normal laryngeal function1,2,7,8,9,10, thus highlighting the urgent need for innovative solutions. Toward this goal, we have been developing an experimental endoscopic approach to investigate laryngeal dysfunction in murine (i.e., mouse and rat) models.

In human medicine, the gold standard for the evaluation of laryngeal dysfunction is endoscopic visualization, referred to as laryngoscopy11,12. Typically, a flexible endoscope is passed through the nose to examine the larynx, particularly the vocal folds and adjacent supraglottic and subglottic laryngeal structures. A rigid endoscope may also be used to visualize the larynx via the oral cavity. Either approach permits gross examination of laryngeal anatomy and can be used to assess laryngeal mobility and function during respiration, phonation, and a variety of airway protective reflexes such as coughing and the laryngeal adductor reflex13,14,15,16. During swallowing, however, the larynx is completely obscured by the epiglottis as it inverts to cover the laryngeal entrance, protecting it from the path of the food/liquid bolus being swallowed. As a result, direct visualization of laryngeal motion during swallowing is not possible in humans and must therefore be indirectly inferred using other diagnostic approaches (e.g., fluoroscopy, electromyography, electroglottography).

This paper describes an innovative laryngoscopy protocol for mice and rats that permits close-up, unobstructed imaging of breathing and airway protection during swallowing under light anesthesia. The protocol is compatible with a variety of commercially available endoscopy systems in combination with a custom platform to immobilize the anesthetized rodent throughout the procedure. Importantly, numerous designs/configurations of endoscopy platforms are indeed possible, depending on each lab's available resources and research agenda. Our intent here is to provide guidance for researchers to consider in the context of their research. Moreover, we aim to demonstrate how this laryngoscopy protocol can lead to a wealth of objective data that may spark novel insights into our understanding of laryngeal dysfunction and regeneration.

The combined effect of all the steps outlined in this murine laryngoscopy protocol results in a minimally invasive examination of the adult murine larynx that can be repeated in the same animals to detect and characterize laryngeal dysfunction over time in response to iatrogenic injury, disease progression, and/or treatment intervention relative to airway protection. Of note, this protocol does not evaluate vocalization-related laryngeal function.

Protocol

The murine laryngoscopy protocol follows an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines. It was developed for use with over 100 adult C57BL/6J mice and over 50 adult Sprague Dawley rats, approximately equal sexes and 6 weeks-12 months old for both species. Additional protocol development is necessary for adaptation to younger/smaller rodents. Animals were group housed (up to four mice or two rats per cage, based on sex and litter). The standard …

Representative Results

Successful use of this murine laryngoscopy protocol results in close-up visualization of the larynx during spontaneous breathing and evoked swallowing under healthy and disease conditions, as shown in Figure 6. Moreover, this protocol can be repeated multiple times in the same rodents to permit investigation of laryngeal function/dysfunction over time. As shown in Figure 7, we successfully repeated this laryngoscopy protocol 6x over a 4-month timespan to investi…

Discussion

We have successfully developed a replicable murine-specific laryngoscopy protocol that permits close-up visualization of laryngeal motion during breathing and swallowing. Importantly, the protocol can be performed over time in the same animals to study the impact of various pathological conditions specifically on laryngeal function. This protocol was developed over the past decade and has undergone substantial modification and troubleshooting along the way. Anesthesia optimization was the greatest challenge to overcome t…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by two NIH grants: 1) a multi-PI (TL and NN) R01 grant (HL153612) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and 2) an R03 grant (TL, DC0110895) from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). Our custom laryngeal motion tracking software development was partially funded by a Coulter Foundation grant (TL & Filiz Bunyak). We thank Kate Osman, Chloe Baker, Kennedy Hoelscher, and Zola Stephenson for providing excellent care of our laboratory rodents. We also acknowledge Roderic Schlotzhauer and Cheston Callais from the MU Physics Machine Shop for their design input and fabrication of our custom endoscopy platform and strategic modifications to commercial endoscopes and micromanipulators to meet our research needs. Our custom laryngeal motion tracking software was developed in collaboration with Dr. Filiz Bunyak and Dr. Ali Hamad (MU Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department). We also thank Jim Marnatti from Karl Storz Endoscopy for providing guidance on otoscope selection. Finally, we would like to recognize numerous previous students/trainees in the Lever Lab whose contributions have informed the development of our current murine laryngoscopy protocol: Marlena Szewczyk, Cameron Hinkel, Abigail Rovnak, Bridget Hopewell, Leslie Shock, Ian Deninger, Chandler Haxton, Murphy Mastin, and Daniel Shu.

Materials

Atipamezole Zoetis Antisedan; 5 mg/mL Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ
Bioamplifier Warner Instrument Corp. DP-304 Hamden, CT
Concentric EMG needle electrode Chalgren Enterprises, Inc. 231-025-24TP; 25 mm x 0.3 mm/30 G Gilroy, CA
Cotton tipped applicator (tapered) Puritan Medical Products REF 25-826 5W Guilford, ME
Data Acquisition System ADInstruments PowerLab 8/30 Colorado Springs, CO
DC Temperature Control System – for endoscopy platform FHC, Inc. 40-90-8D Bowdoin, ME
Electrophysiology recording software ADInstruments LabChart 8 with video capture module Colorado Springs, CO
Endoscope monitor Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Storz Tele Pack X monitor El Segundo, CA
Glycopyrrolate Piramal Critical Care NDC 66794-204-02; 0.2 mg/mL Bethlehem, PA
Ground electrode  Consolidated Neuro Supply, Inc. 27 gauge stainless steel, #S43-438 Loveland, OH
Isoflurane induction chamber  Braintree Scientific, Inc. Gas Anesthetizing Box – Red Braintree, MA
Ketamine hydrochloride Covetrus North America NDC 11695-0703-1, 100 mg/mL Dublin, OH
Metal spatula to decouple epiglottis and velum Fine Science Tools Item No. 10091-12;  Foster City, CA
Micro-brush to remove food/secretions from oral cavity Safeco Dental Supply REF 285-0023, 1.5 mm Buffalo Grove, IL
Mouse-size heating pad for endoscopy platform FHC, Inc. 40-90-2-07 – 5 x 12.5 cm Heating Pad Bowdoin, ME
Ophthalmic ointment (sterile) Allergan, Inc. Refresh Lacri-lube Irvine, CA
Otoscope Karl Storz REF 1232AA El Segundo, CA
Pneumogram Sensor BIOPAC Systems, Inc. RX110 Goleta, CA
Pulse oximetry – Vetcorder Pro Veterinary Monitor Sentier HC, LLC Part No. 710-1750 Waukesha, WI
Rat-size heating pad for endoscopy platform FHC, Inc. 40-90-2 – 12.5X25cm Heating Pad Bowdoin, ME
Sterile needles for drug injections Becton, Dickinson and Company REF 305110, 26 G x 3/8 inch, PrecisionGlide Franklin Lakes, NJ
Sterile syringes for drug injections Becton, Dickinson and Company REF 309628; 1 mL, Luer-Lok tip Franklin Lakes, NJ
Surgical drape to cover induction cage for dark environment Covidien LP Argyle Surgical Drape Material, Single Ply Minneapolis, MN
Surgical tape to secure pneumograph sensor to abdomen 3M Health Care #1527-0, 1/2 inch St. Paul, MN
Transparent blanket for thermoregulation The Glad Products Company  Press’n Seal Cling Film Oakland, CA
Video editing software Pinnacle Systems, Inc. Pinnacle Studio, v24 Mountain View, CA
Water circulating heating pad – for anesthesia induction/recovery station Adroit Medical Systems HTP-1500 Heat Therapy Pump Loudon, TN
Xylazine Vet One NDC 13985-701-10; Anased, 100 mg/mL Boise, ID

References

  1. Brunner, E., Friedrich, G., Kiesler, K., Chibidziura-Priesching, J., Gugatschka, M. Subjective breathing impairment in unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 63 (3), 142-146 (2011).
  2. Chandrasekhar, S. S., et al. Clinical practice guideline: improving voice outcomes after thyroid surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 148 (6 Suppl), S1-S37 (2013).
  3. Fang, T. J., et al. Quality of life measures and predictors for adults with unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Laryngoscope. 118 (10), 1837-1841 (2008).
  4. Wang, W., et al. Laryngeal reinnervation using ansa cervicalis for thyroid surgery-related unilateral vocal fold paralysis: a long-term outcome analysis of 237 cases. PLoS One. 6 (4), e19128 (2011).
  5. Cohen, S. M., et al. Association between dysphagia and inpatient outcomes across frailty level among patients >/= 50 years of age. Dysphagia. 35 (5), 787-797 (2020).
  6. Poulsen, S. H., et al. Signs of dysphagia and associated outcomes regarding mortality, length of hospital stay and readmissions in acute geriatric patients: Observational prospective study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 45, 412-419 (2021).
  7. Lin, R. J., Smith, L. J., Munin, M. C., Sridharan, S., Rosen, C. A. Innervation status in chronic vocal fold paralysis and implications for laryngeal reinnervation. Laryngoscope. 128 (7), 1628-1633 (2018).
  8. Choi, J. S., et al. Functional regeneration of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery using an asymmetrically porous nerve guide conduit in an animal model. Thyroid. 24 (1), 52-59 (2014).
  9. Wang, B., et al. Neurotrophin expression and laryngeal muscle pathophysiology following recurrent laryngeal nerve transection. Mol Med Rep. 13 (2), 1234-1242 (2016).
  10. Woodson, G., Randolph, G. W. Pathophysiology of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Surgery of the Thyroid and Parathyroid Glands (Third Edition). , 404-409.e2 (2021).
  11. James, M., Palmer, O. Instrumentation and techniques for examination of the ear, nose, throat, and sinus. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 24 (2), 167-174 (2012).
  12. Patel, R. R., et al. Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 27 (3), 887-905 (2018).
  13. Kamarunas, E. E., McCullough, G. H., Guidry, T. J., Mennemeier, M., Schluterman, K. Effects of topical nasal anesthetic on fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST). Dysphagia. 29 (1), 33-43 (2014).
  14. Shock, L. A., et al. Improving the utility of laryngeal adductor reflex testing: a translational tale of mice and men. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 153 (1), 94-101 (2015).
  15. Aviv, J. E., et al. Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing and the laryngeal adductor reflex. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 108 (8), 725-730 (1999).
  16. Farneti, D. The instrumental gold standard: fees. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res. 3, 1281-1291 (2014).
  17. Hernandez-Morato, I., et al. Reorganization of laryngeal motoneurons after crush injury in the recurrent laryngeal nerve of the rat. J Anat. 222 (4), 451-461 (2013).
  18. Hernandez-Morato, I., Sharma, S., Pitman, M. J. Changes in neurotrophic factors of adult rat laryngeal muscles during nerve regeneration. Neuroscience. 333, 44-53 (2016).
  19. Tessema, B., et al. Evaluation of functional recovery of recurrent laryngeal nerve using transoral laryngeal bipolar electromyography: a rat model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 117 (8), 604-608 (2008).
  20. Tessema, B., et al. Observations of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and recovery using a rat model. Laryngoscope. 119 (8), 1644-1651 (2009).
  21. Monaco, G. N., et al. Electrical stimulation and testosterone enhance recovery from recurrent laryngeal nerve crush. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 33 (4), 571-578 (2015).
  22. Haney, M. M., Hamad, A., Leary, E., Bunyak, F., Lever, T. E. Automated quantification of vocal fold motion in a recurrent laryngeal nerve injury mouse model. Laryngoscope. 129 (7), E247-E254 (2019).
  23. Schindelin, J., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 9 (7), 676-682 (2012).
  24. Wang, B., et al. Functional regeneration of the transected recurrent laryngeal nerve using a collagen scaffold loaded with laminin and laminin-binding BDNF and GDNF. Sci Rep. 6, 32292 (2016).
  25. Hamad, A., Haney, M. M., Lever, T. E., Bunyak, F. Automated segmentation of the vocal folds in laryngeal endoscopy videos using deep convolutional regression networks. , 140-148 (2019).
  26. Wang, Y. Y., Hamad, A. S., Palaniappan, K., Lever, T. E., Bunyak, F. LARNet-STC: Spatio-temporal orthogonal region selection network for laryngeal closure detection in endoscopy videos. Comput Biol Med. 144, 105339 (2022).
  27. Lever, T. E., et al. Advancing laryngeal adductor reflex testing beyond sensory threshold detection. Dysphagia. 37 (5), 1151-1171 (2022).
  28. Wang, Y. Y., Hamad, A. S., Lever, T. E., Bunyak, F. Orthogonal region selection network for laryngeal closure detection in laryngoscopy videos. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020, 2167-2172 (2020).
  29. Haney, M. M., et al. Recurrent laryngeal nerve transection in mice results in translational upper airway dysfunction. J Comp Neurol. 528 (4), 574-596 (2020).
  30. Mok, A., et al. A surgical mouse model for advancing laryngeal nerve regeneration strategies. Dysphagia. 35 (3), 419-437 (2020).
  31. Haney, M. M., Ericsson, A. C., Lever, T. E. Effects of intraoperative vagal nerve stimulation on the gastrointestinal microbiome in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Comp Med. 68 (6), 452-460 (2018).
  32. Lever, T. E., et al. A mouse model of pharyngeal dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Dysphagia. 25 (2), 112-126 (2010).
  33. Struck, M. B., Andrutis, K. A., Ramirez, H. E., Battles, A. H. Effect of a short-term fast on ketamine-xylazine anesthesia in rats. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 50 (3), 344-348 (2011).
  34. Richardson, C. A., Flecknell, P. A. Anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia following experimental surgery in laboratory rodents: are we making progress. Altern Lab Anim. 33 (2), 119-127 (2005).
  35. Hohlbaum, K., et al. Impact of repeated anesthesia with ketamine and xylazine on the well-being of C57BL/6JRj mice. PLoS One. 13 (9), e0203559 (2018).
  36. Welby, L., Maynard, T., Zohn, I., Lever, T. Fluoroscopic and endoscopic investigation of dysphagia in a mouse model of DiGeorge syndrome. Dysphagia. 34, 1003-1004 (2019).
  37. Mueller, M., et al. Impact of limb phenotype on tongue denervation atrophy, dysphagia penetrance, and survival time in a mouse model of ALS. Dysphagia. 37 (6), 1777-1795 (2022).
  38. Osman, K. L., et al. Optimizing the translational value of mouse models of ALS for dysphagia therapeutic discovery. Dysphagia. 35 (2), 343-359 (2020).
  39. Lever, T. E., et al. Videofluoroscopic validation of a translational murine model of presbyphagia. Dysphagia. 30, 328-342 (2015).
  40. Lever, T. E., et al. Adapting human videofluoroscopic swallow study methods to detect and characterize dysphagia in murine disease models. J Vis Exp. (97), 52319 (2015).
  41. Ballenger, B., et al. Targeted electrical stimulation of the superior laryngeal nerve – a potential treatment for dysphagia in ALS. FASEB J. 36 (S1), (2022).
  42. Kloepper, A., et al. An experimental swallow evoked potential protocol to investigate the neural substrates of swallowing. OTO Open. 4 (1), (2020).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Cite This Article
Lever, T. E., Kloepper, A., Welby, L., Haney, M., Fudge, S., Seiller, C., Kington, S., Ballenger, B., Nichols, N. L. Minimally Invasive Murine Laryngoscopy for Close-Up Imaging of Laryngeal Motion During Breathing and Swallowing. J. Vis. Exp. (202), e66089, doi:10.3791/66089 (2023).

View Video