Summary

In Vitro Model Integrating Substrate Stiffness and Flow to Study Endothelial Cell Responses

Published: July 19, 2024
doi:

Summary

We synthesized and characterized a tunable gelatin-based substrate for culturing vascular endothelial cells (ECs) under relevant vascular flow conditions. This biomimetic surface replicates both physiological and pathological conditions, enabling the study of mechanical forces on EC behavior and advancing our understanding of vascular health and disease mechanisms.

Abstract

We present an innovative in vitro model aimed at investigating the combined effects of tissue rigidity and shear stress on endothelial cell (EC) function, which are crucial for understanding vascular health and the onset of diseases such as atherosclerosis. Traditionally, studies have explored the impacts of shear stress and substrate stiffness on ECs, independently. However, this integrated system combines these factors to provide a more precise simulation of the mechanical environment of the vasculature. The objective is to examine EC mechanotransduction across various tissue stiffness levels and flow conditions using human ECs. We detail the protocol for synthesizing gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogels with tunable stiffness and seeding them with ECs to achieve confluency. Additionally, we describe the design and assembly of a cost-effective flow chamber, supplemented by computational fluid dynamics simulations, to generate physiological flow conditions characterized by laminar flow and appropriate shear stress levels. The protocol also incorporates fluorescence labeling for confocal microscopy, enabling the assessment of EC responses to both tissue compliance and flow conditions. By subjecting cultured ECs to multiple integrated mechanical stimuli, this model enables comprehensive investigations into how factors such as hypertension and aging may affect EC function and EC-mediated vascular diseases. The insights gained from these investigations will be instrumental in elucidating the mechanisms underlying vascular diseases and in developing effective treatment strategies.

Introduction

Endothelium, lining the inner surface of blood vessels, plays a pivotal role in maintaining vascular health. Endothelial cells (ECs) are central to regulating various cardiovascular functions, including vessel tone control, selective permeability, hemostasis, and mechanotransduction1,2. Research has firmly linked EC dysfunction to a primary role in atherosclerosis development. Notably, ECs encounter diverse mechanical forces at the interfaces where they interact with blood flow and underlying vessel tissues3,4. Several studies have associated EC dysfunction with abnormal changes in mechanical factors within the vascular environment, such as the fluid shear stress from blood flow and tissue rigidity5,6,7.

However, prior research has received limited attention in comprehending the combined effects of tissue rigidity and shear stress on EC function. To enhance the ability to translate research outcomes into effective treatments for atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases, it is essential to improve the cellular models used in the field. Significant progress has been made in humanizing cellular models by employing human ECs and subjecting them to either shear stress or substrates with varying stiffness levels8,9,10. However, the adoption and refinement of cellular models that integrate dynamic flow environments with EC substrates possessing adjustable stiffness properties has progressed slowly. The challenge lies in devising non-swelling EC substrates to prevent alterations in flow parameters within the flow channel while also facilitating the cultivation of intact and well-adhered EC monolayers. An in vitro model capable of overcoming these obstacles could facilitate more effective investigations into how hypertension, aging, and flow conditions collaboratively influence EC mechanotransduction, vascular health, and, ultimately, the development of atherosclerosis. Various methods have been developed to apply shear stress on cells while controlling substrate stiffness, including rotating plates and microfluidic devices. In the rotating plate method, cells are placed between two plates and shear stress is applied through the rotational movement of the plates. This method is less complicated and provides a quick model; however, it suffers from spatial shear stress variation, with zero shear stress at the center and maximum shear stress at the periphery11.

On the other hand, microfluidic devices represent the new generation of tools with the ability to control substrate rigidity and flow conditions. These systems are suitable for mimicking microvasculatures under laminar flow conditions. However, studying atherosclerosis with such devices is impractical, as atherosclerosis occurs in large vessels with disturbed flow11. This paper aims to contribute to the critical research domain of EC studies by presenting a cost-effective system capable of examining the effects of varying stiffness levels in EC substrates under different flow conditions. The system integrates substrates with different stiffnesses to emulate pathological and physiological blood vessels. This protocol outlines the method for creating gelatin-based hydrogels with no swelling and stiffness levels of 5 kPa and 10 kPa, representing physiological and pathological stiffness, respectively. Additionally, the construction of a parallel-plate flow chamber capable of integrating these substrates is detailed. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was employed to evaluate shear stress and flow conditions. The preparation of hydrogels for EC culture and the execution of a 6 h flow experiment are described, followed by a discussion on post-experiment immunostaining.

Protocol

1. Synthesis of GelMA Prepare a 0.2 M solution of anhydrous sodium carbonate and a 0.2 M solution of sodium bicarbonate. Mix 46 mL of sodium bicarbonate solution with 15 mL of sodium carbonate solution and add 139 mL of deionized (DI) water. Adjust the pH to 9.5 using 0.1 M NaOH and HCl if necessary. Add 10 g of type A, 300-bloom gelatin from porcine skin to 100 mL of carbonate-bicarbonate buffer at a concentration of 10% w/v. Dissolve the gelatin using a 55 &#17…

Representative Results

Figure 1 depicts the experimental setup, outlining the process of GelMA synthesis through a methacrylation reaction. The resulting product was then used to fabricate the hydrogel substrate, onto which ECs were seeded. Subsequently, the cells were introduced into the flow chamber for a 6 h flow experiment at 12 dyne/cm2. 1H NMR spectroscopy was used to assess the success of the methacrylation reaction (Figure 2A</s…

Discussion

The vascular system is a dynamic environment where various forces significantly influence cellular behavior. Studying biological events in cardiovascular diseases without considering these forces would be inaccurate. Thus, cellular models capable of emulating the vascular mechanical environment are crucial. Researchers have already made significant progress in highlighting the effect of these forces on cellular behavior11. However, to understand cell behavior under both pathological and physiologi…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their gratitude to Robert Egan for his assistance in fabricating the flow chamber. The authors thank Lucas McCauley for his help during the experiments. Additionally, they would like to acknowledge Northeastern University's Institute for Chemical Imaging of Living Systems (CILS) core facilities for granting access to confocal microscopes. The authors acknowledge the funding support provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH 1R01EB027705 awarded to SB) and the National Science Foundation (NSF CAREER Awards: DMR 1847843 to SB and CMMI 1846962 to EE).

Materials

(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate, tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) Invitrogen 15524-010 Hydrogel Fabrication
3-(Trimethoxysilyl)Propyl Methacrylate Sigma-Aldrich 440159 Glass Salinization
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-containing mounting media Vector Laboratories H-1200 Immunostaining
Acetone Thermo Fisher Scientifics A18-4 GelMA Synthesis
Alexa Fluor 555 Phalloidin  Cell Signaling Technology 8953S Immunostaining
Ammonium Persulfate (APS) Bio-Rad 1610700 Hydrogel Fabrication
Clear Scratch- and UV-Resistant Cast Acrylic Sheet (45/64'') McMaster-CARR 8560K165 Flow Chamber Fabrication
Confocal Microscope Carl Zeiss Meditex AG Zeiss LSM 800 Immunostaining
Covidien Monoject Rigid Pack 60 mL Syringes without Needles Fisher   22-031-375 Flow Experiment
EC growth kit  American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) PCS-100-041 Cell Culture
Ethanol 200 Proof Decon Labs 2701 Glass Salinization
Gelatin Type A (300 bloom) from porcine skin Sigma-Aldrich G1890 GelMA Synthesis
Glacial Acetic Acid Thermo Fisher Scientifics 9526-33 Glass Salinization
High-Purity High-Temperature Silicone Rubber Sheet McMaster-Carr 87315K74 Flow Chamber Fabrication
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) PSC-100-010 Cell Culture
M3x30mm Machine Screws Hex Socket Round Head Screw 304 Stainless Steel Fasteners Bolts 20pcs Uxcell B07Q5RM2TP Flow Chamber Fabrication
Masterflex L/S Digital Drive with Easy-Load® 3 Pump Head for Precision Tubing; 115/230 VAC VWR #MFLX77921-65 Flow Experiment 
Masterflex L/S Precision Pump Tubing, Puri-Flex, L/S 25; 25 ft VWR #MFLX96419-25 Flow Experiment 
Methacrylic Anhydride (MAH) Sigma-Aldrich 276685 GelMA Synthesis
Paraformaldehyde Thermo Fisher Scientifics 043368.9M Cell Culture
Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) Gibco 14080-055 General
Sodium Bicarbonate Fisher Chemical S233-3 GelMA Synthesis
Sodium Carbonate Fisher Chemical S263-500 GelMA Synthesis
SOLIDWORKS educational version
SOLIDWORKS Student Edition Desktop, 2023 SolidWorks N/A Flow Chamber Design
Vascular Basal Medium American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) PCS-100-030 Cell Culture

References

  1. Deanfield, J. E., Halcox, J. P., Rabelink, T. J. Endothelial function and dysfunction. Circulation. 115 (10), 1285-1295 (2007).
  2. Suowen, X., et al. Endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and beyond: From mechanism to oharmacotherapies. Pharmacol Rev. 73 (3), 924 (2021).
  3. Jansen, K. A., Atherton, P., Ballestrem, C. Mechanotransduction at the cell-matrix interface. Sem Cel Dev Biol. 71, 75-83 (2017).
  4. Tarbell, J. M., Pahakis, M. Y. Mechanotransduction and the glycocalyx. J Int Med. 259 (4), 339-350 (2006).
  5. Topper, J. N., Cai, J., Falb, D., Gimbrone, M. A. Identification of vascular endothelial genes differentially responsive to fluid mechanical stimuli: cyclooxygenase-2, manganese superoxide dismutase, and endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase are selectively up-regulated by steady laminar shear stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 93 (19), 10417-10422 (1996).
  6. Mitchell, G. F., et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events. Circulation. 121 (4), 505-511 (2010).
  7. Bonetti, P. O., Lerman, L. O., Lerman, A. Endothelial dysfunction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 23 (2), 168-175 (2003).
  8. Hamrangsekachaee, M., et al. Endothelial glycocalyx sensitivity to chemical and mechanical sub-endothelial substrate properties. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 11, 1250348 (2023).
  9. Mensah, S. A., et al. Flow-regulated endothelial glycocalyx determines metastatic cancer cell activity. FASEB J. 34 (5), 6166-6184 (2020).
  10. Russell-Puleri, S., et al. Fluid shear stress induces upregulation of COX-2 and PGI2 release in endothelial cells via a pathway involving PECAM-1, PI3K, FAK, and p38. Am J Physiol-Heart Cir Physiol. 312 (3), H485-H500 (2016).
  11. Hamrangsekachaee, M., Wen, K., Bencherif, S. A., Ebong, E. E. Atherosclerosis and endothelial mechanotransduction: current knowledge and models for future research. Am J Physiol-Cell Physiol. 324 (2), C488-C504 (2022).
  12. Zhu, M., et al. Gelatin methacryloyl and its hydrogels with an exceptional degree of controllability and batch-to-batch consistency. Sci Rep. 9 (1), 6863 (2019).
  13. Kim, J., Bencherif, S. A., Li, W. A., Mooney, D. J. Cell-friendly inverse opal-like hydrogels for a spatially separated co-culture system. Macromol Rapid Comm. 35 (18), 1578-1586 (2014).
  14. Orr, A. W., et al. The subendothelial extracellular matrix modulates NF-kappaB activation by flow: a potential role in atherosclerosis. J Cell Biol. 169 (1), 191-202 (2005).
  15. Hamrangsekachaee, M., Baumann, H. J., Pukale, D. D., Shriver, L. P., Leipzig, N. D. Investigating mechanisms of subcutaneous preconditioning incubation for neural stem cell embedded hydrogels. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 5 (5), 2176-2184 (2022).
  16. Rezaeeyazdi, M., Colombani, T., Memic, A., Bencherif, S. A. Injectable hyaluronic acid-co-gelatin cryogels for tissue-engineering applications. Materials. 11 (8), 1374 (2018).
  17. Belvitch, P., Htwe, Y. M., Brown, M. E., Dudek, S. Cortical actin dynamics in endothelial permeability. Curr Top Membr. 82, 141-195 (2018).
  18. Krishnamoorthy, S., Noorani, B., Xu, C. Effects of encapsulated cells on the physical-mechanical properties and microstructure of gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Int J Mol Sci. 20 (20), 5061 (2019).
  19. Jin, Q., et al. Bioprinting small-diameter vascular vessel with endothelium and smooth muscle by the approach of two-step crosslinking process. Biotechnol Bioeng. 119 (6), 1673-1684 (2022).
  20. Villard, P., et al. Autoclavable and injectable cryogels for biomedical applications. Adv Healthcare Mater. 8 (17), 1900679 (2019).
  21. Bencherif, S. A., et al. Influence of cross-linker chemistry on release kinetics of PEG-co-PGA hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 90 (1), 142-153 (2009).
  22. Rogers, Z. J., Zeevi, M. P., Koppes, R., Bencherif, S. A. Electroconductive hydrogels for tissue engineering: Current status and future perspectives. Bioelectricity. 2 (3), 279-292 (2020).
  23. James, B. D., Allen, J. B. Vascular endothelial cell behavior in complex mechanical microenvironments. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 4 (11), 3818-3842 (2018).
  24. Yeh, Y. T., et al. Matrix stiffness regulates endothelial cell proliferation through septin 9. PLoS One. 7 (10), e4688 (2012).
  25. Fioretta, E. S., Fledderus, J. O., Baaijens, F. P. T., Bouten, C. V. C. Influence of substrate stiffness on circulating progenitor cell fate. J Biomech. 45 (5), 736-744 (2012).
  26. Geemen, D. v., et al. F-Actin-anchored focal adhesions distinguish endothelial phenotypes of human arteries and veins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 34 (9), 2059-2067 (2014).
  27. Dessalles, C. A., Leclech, C., Castagnino, A., Barakat, A. I. Integration of substrate- and flow-derived stresses in endothelial cell mechanobiology. Comm Biol. 4 (1), 764 (2021).
  28. Estrada, R., Giridharan, G. A., Nguyen, M. D., Prabhu, S. D., Sethu, P. Microfluidic endothelial cell culture model to replicate disturbed flow conditions seen in atherosclerosis susceptible regions. Biomicrofluidics. 5 (3), 32006-3200611 (2011).
  29. Inglebert, M., et al. The effect of shear stress reduction on endothelial cells: A microfluidic study of the actin cytoskeleton. Biomicrofluidics. 14 (2), 024115 (2020).
  30. Noria, S., et al. Assembly and reorientation of stress fibers drives morphological changes to endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. Am J Pathol. 164 (4), 1211-1223 (2004).
  31. Amer, M., Shi, L., Wolfenson, H. The ‘Yin and Yang’ of cancer cell growth and mechanosensing. Cancers (Basel). 13 (19), 4754 (2021).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Cite This Article
Hamrangsekachaee, M., Chen, Y., Tressler, E. R., Bencherif, S. A., Ebong, E. E. In Vitro Model Integrating Substrate Stiffness and Flow to Study Endothelial Cell Responses. J. Vis. Exp. (209), e67081, doi:10.3791/67081 (2024).

View Video