JoVE Science Education
Neuropsychology
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Science Education Neuropsychology
Motor Maps
  • 00:00Overview
  • 01:37Experimental Design
  • 04:24Running the Experiment
  • 07:18Data Analysis and Representative Results
  • 09:04Applications
  • 10:38Summary

モーター マップ

English

Share

Overview

ソース: ジョナス ・ t. カプラン サラ I. ギンベル所-南カリフォルニア大学

脳組織の 1 つの原則は、情報の地形のマッピングです。感覚と運動野を中心に脳の隣接領域を脳の表面に表される体のマップで得られた体の隣接する部分から情報を表現する傾向があります。脳の感覚と運動のプライマリ マップ中央の溝として知られている顕著な溝を囲みます。中心溝皮質は中心前回として知られているし、一次運動野には皮質中心溝の後方、側頭葉として知られている、一次感覚野 (図 1) が含まれていますが含まれています。

Figure 1
図 1: 中心溝の周りの感覚と運動のマップ。体のエフェクタのモーター地図が含まれています、一次運動皮質は前頭葉の中心前回で、中心溝です。体の外部の部分からタッチ、痛み、温度情報を受け取ると、一次体性感覚野 (感覚の) 野は頭頂葉の側頭葉に中心溝の後方にあります。

この実験では、脳機能イメージングを使用して、前回のモーター地図をデモンストレーションします。このマップと呼ばれますモーターのホムンクルスであるラテン語「小さな男」の 1 つの人の脳のこの部分で表される自己のほとんどのバージョンがあるようです。このマップの 1 つの興味深いプロパティは、皮質領域よりは、手と口は、皮質におけるこれらの肢の不均衡な表現の結果などの細かい制御を必要とする体の部分に専念です。また、モーター システムの解剖学のため体の右側をコントロールする神経細胞が、左の一次運動野です。したがって、実験の参加者は、自分の右手や足を移動するように求めている、自分の左の前回の増加活性化が期待されます。

この実験では、参加者は、脳の活動を fMRI で測定しながら交互に手と左と右の側面の足を移動する求められます。FMRI の信号が参加者の運動期間、動きと比較して低速である血液酸素濃度の変化に依存しているためには互いから、安静時のベースラインから、様々 な条件を識別できるように静けさの期間を区切られます。動きの正確なタイミングを達成するために参加者は開始および各動作を視覚を終了するときに指示されます。このビデオ内のメソッドは、一次運動野の somatotopy を示しているいくつかの fMRI の研究で使用されるものに似ています。1, 2

Procedure

1. 20 人の参加者を募集します。 参加者に神経学的または精神的な障害の歴史がないことを確認します。 参加者はすべて右利き利き手アンケートを使用してを確認します。 参加者は視覚的な合図を正しく見ることができる、ように彼らが正常または正常な視力を修正。 参加者は、自分の体でない金属を持っていることを確認します。これ高磁場 fMRI の関与のた…

Results

In this experiment, researchers measured brain activity with fMRI, while participants moved their hands or feet. Statistical analysis of the changes in blood flow is represented by different colors on the surface of the standard atlas brain. The colors identify the voxels, whose time course best matched the predicted time course for a specific condition.

The results demonstrate different activation foci within the precentral gyrus for the movement of the different limbs (Figure 2). Movement of the right hand produced the greatest activation on the left lateral surface of the gyrus (blue), while movement of the left hand produced the greatest activation on the right lateral surface (green). When participants moved their feet, activation was greatest where the precentral gyrus extends around to the medial surface of the brain. Right-sided foot movements produced activation on the left medial surface (cyan), while the greatest activation for left foot movements was on the right medial surface (yellow).

Figure 2
Figure 2: Brain activations resulting from movement of the hands and feet across participants. Blue = Movement of the right hand; Green = Movement of the left hand; Cyan = Movement of the right foot; Yellow = Movement of the left foot.

Applications and Summary

These results demonstrate the somatotopic, or body-mapped organization of the human primary motor cortex. This mapping has implications for how damage to the brain affects movement. For example, damage to the left precentral gyrus leads to difficulty in moving the right side of the body, and the specific parts of primary motor cortex affected can lead to problems in controlling specific parts of the body. However, it is also important to note that the primary motor cortex is only one of many brain regions involved in the control of movement. The precentral gyrus is part of a wider network of brain regions that participate in the selection, planning, and coordination of movement.

The ability to measure effector-specific activity in motor cortex also leads to the possibility of brain-computer interfaces, such as those that allow control of prosthetic limbs. For example, using direct recordings of neurons in the primary motor cortex, researchers have demonstrated that monkeys can control a prosthetic limb to feed themselves.3

References

  1. Lotze, M., et al. fMRI evaluation of somatotopic representation in human primary motor cortex. Neuroimage 11, 473-481 (2000).
  2. Rao, S.M., et al. Somatotopic mapping of the human primary motor cortex with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurology 45, 919-924 (1995).
  3. Velliste, M., Perel, S., Spalding, M.C., Whitford, A.S. & Schwartz, A.B. Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature 453, 1098-1101 (2008).

Transcript

Motor information is organized according to anatomical divisions in the primary motor cortex, creating a topographical map in the brain.

Located in the precentral gyrus, cortical representations of the body are organized into a motor homunculus—”little man”—and are arranged in an inverted manner, such that the areas that control the toes are found in the medial wall and the tongue is located near the lateral sulcus.

Furthermore, body parts that require finer voluntary motor control, such as the hands and their associated digits, have larger representations in the cortex, compared to anatomical features that don’t require such precise manipulation—like the hip.

The homunculus is also lateralized, with neurons in the left primary motor cortex—shown here—controlling the right side of the body, and vice versa. Thus, when an individual moves their right hip, there is increased cortical activation on their left precentral gyrus within a discrete region.

This video details an experiment that uses modern functional neuroimaging to demonstrate the body-mapped organization of the human primary motor cortex, including how to collect and analyze brain activity when participants move their hands or feet.

In this experiment, brain activity is measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging, abbreviated as fMRI, while participants are repetitively cued to move different body parts—like the digits on their left or right hands.

This technique relies on changes in blood oxygenation levels, referred to as the BOLD—Blood-Oxygenation-Level-Dependent—response. For an in-depth look at the principles behind the method, please refer to another video in JOVE’s SciEd Essentials of Neuroscience Collection, fMRI: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

In the context presented here, when a body part, such as the left foot, is flexing back and forth, oxygenated cerebral blood flow—supplied by arteries in the brain—increases to neural regions that are active during this movement, like the primary motor cortex.

However, this hemodynamic response occurs more slowly than the actual physical motion, which warrants that actions be separated with periods of rest.

Thus, each body movement is precisely timed to distinguish the four conditions from one another: left hand, left foot, right hand, and right foot.

For example, participants in a fMRI machine are asked to start gesturing their left hand when one appears on the left side of a presentation screen.

The required hand movement is actually complex, and involves touching the thumb to each finger, in order, starting with the pointer. Then, the participant must repeat these actions in the opposite direction, starting with the pinky.

Movement is stopped when the cue—in this instance, the picture of the left hand—disappears from the screen.

Likewise, when they see a foot on the right, they are instructed to move their right foot by pushing it down repeatedly, until the image disappears.

Here, the dependent variable is the intensity of the BOLD response after a movement from the hand or foot, which can then be localized to specific brain regions.

For a left hand movement, brain activation is primarily expected on the right dorsolateral surface of the precentral gyrus. In contrast, for a right hand movement, brain activation is anticipated on the left dorsolateral surface. These results would align with the lateralized motor homunculus.

Prior to the experiment, recruit participants who are right-handed, have normal or corrected-to-normal vision, do not have any metallic implants in their body, or suffer from claustrophobia on account of experimental control and safety concerns.

Have them fill out pre-scan paperwork, which includes questions related to health and safety issues during the session, such as consent for a radiologist to look at their images in the case of incidental findings, as well as detailing the risks and benefits of the study.

Ask the participant to also remove all metal objects from their body—including watches, phones, wallets, keys, belts, and coins—to prepare for entering into the scanning room.

Next, explain the task rules: the appendage they need to move—in this case their foot—will appear as a visual cue on the corresponding side of the screen. Demonstrate how they should move their foot by repeatedly pressing it down, as if pushing on an imaginary pedal.

When a hand cue appears, they must touch the thumb to each finger of the same hand in order and then repeat this sequence in reverse.

Now, bring the participant into the imaging room. Provide earplugs to protect their ears from loud noises and earphones so that they can hear any additional communication during the session. Have them lie down on the bed with their head in the coil and secure it with foam pads to avoid excess movement and blur during the scan.

Above the participants’ eyes, place a mirror that reflects a screen at the back of the scanner bore. Then, give them a squeeze ball to use in case of emergency. Also remind them that it is very important to stay as still as possible the entire time.

After guiding the participant inside the machine, first collect high-resolution, anatomical images. To begin the functional portion, synchronize the stimulus presentation with the start of the scanner.

Present the visual cues via a laptop connected to a projector, each for 12 s, followed by 12 s of resting baseline. Alternate between the four conditions: left hand, right hand, left foot, and right foot—repeating each four times within 6.5 min.

Once the scan is completed, direct the participant out of the room. Debrief them and provide compensation for their participation in the study.

As the first step of the analysis, preprocess the data by performing motion correction to reduce artifacts, temporal filtering to remove signal drifts, and spatial smoothing to increase the signal-to-noise ratio.

Using these data, create a model of the expected hemodynamic response for each task condition. Then, fit the data to this model, resulting in a statistical map for each subject, where the value at each voxel—a 3D pixel of volume—represents the extent to which that voxel was involved in the task condition.

Register the participant’s brain to a standard atlas in order to combine data across each participant. Then, combine all statistical maps across participants for a group level analysis. Note that changes in blood flow are represented by different colors on the surface of the brain.

Movements of the right hand, shown in blue, produced the greatest activation on the left lateral surface of the precentral gyrus, whereas engaging the left hand, represented in green, produced the greatest activation on the right lateral surface.

Additionally, flexing the right foot, indicated by light blue, produced activation on the left medial surface, while the greatest activation for left foot movements, in yellow, were on the right medial surface.

These results suggest that motor actions can be localized to discrete regions of the primary motor cortex in both hemispheres, supporting the motor homunculus.

Now that you are familiar with executing an fMRI experiment to observe the organization of the primary motor cortex, let’s consider how the brain manages movement after damage, or after the attachment of prosthetic limbs.

Damage to the left precentral gyrus, such as from a stroke, can lead to difficulty in moving the right side of the body.

As you’ve learned in this video, the specific parts that are impacted depend upon the extent of injury: impairments could be small and affect a single finger, or large enough to influence all of the digits and the entire arm.

While the representations seem straightforward, the primary motor cortex does not work alone, as it’s just a segment within a wider network of regions that are involved in the selection, planning, and coordination of movement. Thus, localizing damage may not be as easy as it seems.

One potential therapeutic approach for improving limb function in amputees involves brain-computer interfaces. This technically advanced method is based on electromyographic, or EMG signals—the electrical communication between motor neurons and muscle movements.

Researchers are developing ways to integrate EMG recordings with limb prostheses to more seamlessly control motor behaviors, like standing, or even walking up a ramp.

You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to motor maps. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and conduct the fMRI experiment, and finally how to analyze and interpret the brain activation results.

Thanks for watching!

Tags

Cite This
JoVE Science Education Database. JoVE Science Education. Motor Maps. JoVE, Cambridge, MA, (2023).