Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) is a method of conditioning tissues against damaging stress. We have established a method of remote ischemia at the hind limb, by inflating a sphygmomanometer cuff for 5-10 min. The neuroprotective capabilities of RIP have been demonstrated in a model of retinal degeneration in rodents.
Sublethal ischemia protects tissues against subsequent, more severe ischemia through the upregulation of endogenous mechanisms in the affected tissue. Sublethal ischemia has also been shown to upregulate protective mechanisms in remote tissues. A brief period of ischemia (5-10 min) in the hind limb of mammals induces self-protective responses in the brain, lung, heart and retina. The effect is known as remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP). It is a therapeutically promising way of protecting vital organs, and is already under clinical trials for heart and brain injuries. This publication demonstrates a controlled, minimally invasive method of making a limb – specifically the hind limb of a rat – ischemic. A blood pressure cuff developed for use in human neonates is connected to a manual sphygmomanometer and used to apply 160 mmHg pressure around the upper part of the hind limb. A probe designed to detect skin temperature is used to verify the ischemia, by recording the drop in skin temperature caused by pressure-induced occlusion of the leg arteries, and the rise in temperature which follows release of the cuff. This method of RIP affords protection to the rat retina against bright light-induced damage and degeneration.
The survival of most, perhaps all, tissues in the face of metabolic stress can be improved by prior conditioning with a period of sublethal ischemia1,2. Ischemic preconditioning (IP) in practical terms is the exposure of tissue to sublethal ischemia, before the tissue experiences more severe stressors, such as a subsequent ischemic insult. In animal models, IP provides striking protection to the brain, retina, heart and lungs3-6. Correspondingly, observations in stroke patients showed a link between previous transient ischemic attacks and better clinical outcomes7,8. IP also protects retinal photoreceptors from non-ischemic injuries9.
The effectiveness of IP in diverse tissues and injuries suggests that it is activating an innate mechanism of cell survival present in all tissue. Ischemic preconditioning of the myocardium has been suggested to have protective effects through the upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF), known to regulate many metabolic pathways through the release of adenosine or through the opening of mitochondrial ATP potassium channels10,11. Adenosine release and ATP potassium channels are implicated in cerebral ischemia but, investigations into the neuroprotective mechanisms of ischemic conditioning to date have been focused on modifications to anti-excitotoxicity, anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory pathways12,13. Overall, understanding of the molecular process of ischemic conditioning for protecting neurons is limited.
Remote ischemic preconditioning attempts to condition distant critically important organs (heart, brain, lung) by generating ischemia in less critical tissues. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) using the hind limb has been demonstrated to be neuroprotective in rodent models of stroke14-17. The method described by us provides a simple, reliable and non-invasive protocol for inducing RIP.
The vast majority of RIP protocols involve the hind limb, presumably because the femoral artery located in the upper hind limb can be easily identified and accessed for surgical clamping and tourniquet application. In invasive limb ischemic studies for the study of brain and skin protection, ischemia is induced by separating the femoral artery from the groin ligaments and clamping the femoral artery2,15,18.
The ischemia resulting from either limb cuffing or femoral artery clamping has been confirmed by changes at the limb including a loss of pulse, decrease in oxygenation and a drop in skin temperature. Remote ischemia can be confirmed by the loss of pulse by using laser Doppler or ultrasound Doppler17-19. Skin temperature can be used as alternative to Doppler although the relationship is non-linear20,21. Accurate temperature recordings are commonplace in laboratories and can be easily incorporated into remote ischemic studies.
An alternative to femoral clamping surgery is the induction of ischemia using a tourniquet. Tourniquet application produces comparable ischemia to that achieved with vessel clamping; Kutchner et al. compared invasive femoral artery clamping to a non-invasive tourniquet and found both methods halted blood flow to the limb and reduced skin damage in a plastic surgery model of skin flap ischemia18. Cuffing either the leg or arm and raising the cuff pressure to above systolic blood pressure has been found to be protective against ischemic damage in pigs and humans17,19,22.
Different tourniquet approaches to inducing remote ischemic include the use of a blood pressure cuff or an elastic band17,22,23. However, the use of an elastic band to induce ischemia is an unsafe method, potentially giving rise to an unregulated amount of pressure in the limb, with pressure rises above 500 mmHg being recorded in humans24. Further, limb ischemia using an elastic band leads to muscle damage in rats following the removal of the band23, as assessed by Evans Blue Dye, an in vivo marker of myofiber permeability25. In contrast, delivery of a controlled pressure to the tourniquet can be achieved using a blood pressure cuff connected to a sphygmomanometer17,19,22,26.
In this study, a light injury model of photoreceptor degeneration was used to demonstrate the neuroprotective efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning. Remote ischemia was induced immediately before light injury, and prevented subsequent photoreceptor degeneration as confirmed by retinal function testing. The accompanying video will demonstrate the application of non-invasive remote ischemia.
Ethics statement: The protocol follows the animal care guidelines of University of Sydney, AEC #5657. Anaesthesia was approved by animal ethics committee (University of Sydney, AEC #5657).
1. Equipment Preparation
2. Calibration of the Manual Sphygmomanometer
3. Animal Preparation
Note: Animals that are to undergo light injury require dark adaption the night before remote ischemia. Animals undergoing light damage require dark rearing (12 hr light:dark cycle (5 lux))
4. Application of Skin Temperature Probe
5. Remote Ischemia
6. Light Injury – Retinal Degeneration Model
7. Post-remote Ischemia Procedures
8. TUNEL Assay
A blood pressure cuff elevated to above 160 mmHg halts blood flow to the hind limb as seen clearly in Figure 1B. The lack of tissue oxygenation resulted in a reducing the animal’s foot temperature for an ischemia-reperfusion protocol (Figure 2). The foot temperature (33 °C) was lower than core temperature and reliably reduced during cuff pressure elevation (31 °C) rising when the cuff was deflated (32 °C). A single 1,000 lux light injury was delivered to dim raised albino rats with or without remote ischemic preconditioning. Retinal function was recorded and assessed using the electroretinogram (ERG).
The ERG is the summation of electrical responses originating from the inner and outer neurons of the retina to light stimulation as shown in Figure 3. The ERG waveform has an early negative peak arising from phototransduction (minimum approximately 10 msec after light flash) termed the a-wave and a large positive peak from the inner retina (maximum approximately 80 msec after light flash) termed the b-wave. The dark-adapted ERG from a normal dim raised rat showed a large photoreceptor and inner retinal response to a bright 2.0 log cd.s.m-2 flash (Figure 3A). One week following light injury the ERG recordings had a severe reduction in amplitude relative to controls, reflecting the loss of photoreceptors; see Figure 3B. Preconditioning the hind limb with ischemia using a reperfusion protocol of 2 x 5 min immediately before ischemia protected the photoreceptors from light injury. The RIP ERG amplitudes were greater than light injury alone, with a slight reduction to the a-wave see (Figure 3C). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay on cryopreserved sections of the retina confirmed a reduction of apoptotic cells in light damaged animals receiving RIP relative to sham-treated light injury animals (Figure 4).
The induction of ischemia to the hind limb relies on the correct placement of the cuff, as seen in Figure 1. A cuff placed below the “knee” does not protect photoreceptors from light injury as reflected in the reduced ERG amplitudes, see Figure 3D.
In conclusion, when administered correctly hind limb ischemia was able to protect retinal neurons from light injury.
Figure 1: Cuff placement and effect of cuff pressure above 160 mmHg. (A) Shows the hind limb and foot before cuff pressure elevation. (B) Shows the foot during elevation of cuff pressure above 160 mmHg. Note the position of the cuff above the “knee”. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Foot temperature is reduced during cuff inflation. Inflation of the cuff on the hind limb for 2 x 5 min at 160 mmHg reduced skin temperature during ischemia. (A) Shows the group average for 2 x 5 min RIP foot temperature changes. (B) Shows a representative foot temperature (°C) tracing for 2 x 5 min ischemia. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: RIP preserves retinal function as demonstrated in the ERG compared to light damage rats. Exposure to bright light for 24 hr damages the photoreceptors of the retina. The ERG measures the health of inner and outer retina as an electrical response (microvolts [µV]) to light stimulation. The normal retinal response to 2.0 log cd.s.m-2 light stimulation seen in (A). Photoreceptor damage from bright light results in a smaller ERG amplitude (B). RIP was able to rescue the photoreceptors following light injury (C). Incorrect cuff placement during RIP does not protect photoreceptors from injury (D). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: TUNEL+ cell counts. A bar graph comparing group result for light injury, injury + RIP demonstrate the reduction in apoptosis with RIP. TUNEL+ cell were counted across the entire span of the retina (8,000 µm). Top panel: group average of TUNEL+ cells were lower for RIP treated rats (210 ± 4.9, n = 5) compared to light injury alone (255 ± 10, n = 5), p <0.01, one-way ANOVA. Undamaged retinas (no light injury) had very low (3.0 ± 1.4, n = 5) apoptotic cells. (A) Representative image of superior light injured retina. (B) Representative image of superior RIP-light injured retina. (C) Representative image of inferior light injured retina. (D) Representative image of inferior RIP-light injured retina. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Rodent hind limb ischemia was successfully induced with a manual sphygmomanometer and cuff delivering neuroprotection to the photoreceptors of the retina. A finding consistent with ischemic conditioning induced protection of photoreceptors from light injury9,28.
Essentially, remote ischemia causes brief oxygen deprivation to tissues. Hence, remote ischemic preconditioning has many similarities to ischemic conditioning or alternatively termed ischemic tolerance, hypoxic preconditioning, and to some extent, anaerobic exercise. Cells respond to ischemic challenge by releasing a large variety of proteins, nucleoside and transcription factors that either offer neuroprotection directly or affect cells to become tolerant of subsequent metabolic stress13.
In the literature, remote ischemia protocols have included a range of durations and frequencies. Our lab has tested 5, 10, and 2 x 5 min ischemia protocols on normal retina function26. Of these protocols 2 x 5 min produced the greatest ERG amplitude change in normal rats and was selected to test in a model of light injury. Short and repeated 5 min ischemic events have also been shown to be preventive in recurring strokes in humans and to reduce infarct size in experimental stroke in pigs17,22. However, the most appropriate duration of ischemic preconditioning is likely to be dependent on the animal model used. For example, a reduction in infarct size against focal ischemia has been observed in longer 2 x 15 min and 3 x 15 min protocols, but not in 3 x 5 min protocols in rats15.
The time between IP and ischemic injury also needs to be considered for effective neuroprotection. Two time windows have been classified for cardioprotection induced by IP. These are the “classic conditioning” window, which occurs 0-12 hr after IP and the “second window”, which occurs 3-4 days after IP29. In a focal stroke model, RIP was found to be protective at multiple time points, including those outside the classic and second windows15. However, there have been few studies which have compared the time periods of neuroprotection in RIP and IP.
A further consideration for remote ischemia protection is the timing of the conditioning, including whether it is applied before injury (preconditioning) or after injury (postconditioning). The majority of remote ischemia testing has used preconditioning despite postconditioning studies having recently been found to be protective of both retinal and cerebral neurons30,31.
In summary, the induction of neuroprotection in hind limb ischemic conditioning is specific to the disease model, animal species, the duration of ischemia, and the timing of ischemia. A review by Kaniora et al. provides further details about the variety of remote ischemia protocols, including the species, RIP protocols, RIP sites, injury models, injury outcomes and proposed protection mechanisms32.
The minimally invasive cuff on the hind limb allows for RIP in both awake and animals provided the body temperature is maintained. In anesthetized experimentation, the animal’s body temperature must be maintained to prevent hypothermia. Internal temperature monitoring will prevent the animal undergoing hypothermia or hyperthermia. Hypothermia and hyperthermia are well-known pre-conditioning stimuli in both stroke models and light injury33-36. The JoVE method presented can be performed in awake animals thereby preventing body temperature confounds.
Anesthetics may introduce a different set of confounds in RIP experimentation. Isoflurane can participate in myocardium protection via opening of ATP-sensitive potassium channels, a similar protective mechanism reported in ischemic conditioning37. Although the size of the infarct in stroke models remains large in sham-treated animals given isoflurane, the molecular mechanism underlying remote ischemic conditioning may be masked by the effects of anesthetics. Ketamine, an NMDA antagonist, has a multitude of protective effects in vivo38, including the potential to prevent excitotoxicity to neurons, activate the mTOR pathway and release BDNF into the serum39-41. Ketamine has been reported to enhance neuronal survival following brain trauma in humans and reduce light injury in rodent photoreceptors42,43. Investigations into the mechanism of remote ischemic conditioning with awake blood pressure cuffing will avoid anesthetic confounds.
Effective hind limb ischemia relies on the correct placement of the cuff, consistency of the cuff pressure and cuff pressure elevation above systolic blood pressure as seen in Figure 1. A cuff placed below the “knee” does not protect photoreceptors from light injury as reflected in the reduced electroretinogram (ERG) amplitudes. The difference in conditioning based on the position of the cuff is likely due to differences in muscle mass and proximity to the femoral artery. In addition, animals should be standardized for age, weight, body temperature and gender.
In summary, remote ischemia can be induced by a non-invasive blood pressure cuff, which avoids muscle injury and has the flexibility for awake or anesthetized experimentation. Remote ischemic preconditioning is an emerging neuroprotective strategy and this protocol will enable further studies into its mechanisms and applications.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The author is grateful for the assistance of Mrs. Sharon Spana (University of Sydney) in rodent monitoring, handling and experimentation. The authorwould like to thank Prof. Jonathan Stone and Dr. Dan Johnstone for the assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. PhD funding support has been provided by University of Sydney and Australian Center for Excellence in Vision.
Gold series DuraShock Hand Aneroid Sphygmomanometer | Welch Allyn | DS56 | Manual Sphygmomanometer |
Neonate [size 2] 1 Tube, 10 Pack | Welch Allyn | 5082-102-1 | Limb blood pressure cuff |
Luer lock adaptor | Welch Allyn | 5082-178 | Adaptor for neonatal cuff |
Thermistor pod | AD Instruments | ML 309 | skin tempertature unit |
Skin temperture probe | AD Instruments | MLT 422/A | |
Powerlab, 4 channel acquistion hardware | AD Instruments | PL 35044 | Skin temperature recorder |
Homeothermic blanket system with flexible probe | Harvard Appartus | 507222F | |
Towel | optional: awake remote ischemia | ||
Isoflo – 100% Isoflurane -250 ml | Abbot Animal Health | 05260-05 | optional: inhaltion anaesthetic remote ischemia |
Ketamil – ketamine 100 mg/ml – 50 ml | Troy Laboratories Pty Ltd | optional: injectable anaesthetic remote ischemia | |
Xylium – Xylazine 100 mg/ml – 50 ml | Troy Laboratories Pty Ltd | optional: injectable anaesthetic remote ischemia |