Summary

Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods

Published: August 04, 2022
doi:

Summary

The combination of laser capture microdissection and microfluidic RT-qPCR provides anatomic and biotechnical specificity in measuring the transcriptome in single neurons and glia. Applying creative methods with a system’s biology approach to psychiatric disease may lead to breakthroughs in understanding and treatment such as the neuroinflammation antireward hypothesis in addiction.

Abstract

Increasing rates of addiction behavior have motivated mental health researchers and clinicians alike to understand antireward and recovery. This shift away from reward and commencement necessitates novel perspectives, paradigms, and hypotheses along with an expansion of the methods applied to investigate addiction. Here, we provide an example: A systems biology approach to investigate antireward that combines laser capture microdissection (LCM) and high-throughput microfluidic reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reactions (RT-qPCR). Gene expression network dynamics were measured and a key driver of neurovisceral dysregulation in alcohol and opioid withdrawal, neuroinflammation, was identified. This combination of technologies provides anatomic and phenotypic specificity at single-cell resolution with high-throughput sensitivity and specific gene expression measures yielding both hypothesis-generating datasets and mechanistic possibilities that generate opportunities for novel insights and treatments.

Introduction

Addiction remains a growing challenge in the developed world1,2. Despite major scientific and clinical advances, rates of addiction continue to increase while the efficacy of established treatments remains stable at best3,4,5. However, advances in biotechnology and scientific approaches have led to novel methods and hypotheses to further investigate the pathophysiology of substance dependence6,7,8. Indeed, recent developments suggest that novel concepts and treatment paradigms may lead to breakthroughs with social, economic, and political consequences9,10,11,12.

We investigated antireward in the withdrawal of alcohol and opioid dependence13,14,15,16. Methods are central to this paradigm17,18. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) can select single cells with high anatomic specificity. This functionality is integral to the neuroinflammation antireward hypothesis as both glia and neurons can be collected and analyzed from the same neuronal subnucleus in the same animal13,14,15,16,19. A relevant portion of the transcriptome of selected cells can then be measured with high-throughput microfluidic reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reactions (RT-qPCR) providing high-dimensional datasets for computational analysis yielding insights into functional networks20,21.

Measuring a subset of the transcriptome in neurons and glia in a specific brain nucleus generates a dataset that is robust in both sample number and genes measured and is sensitive and specific. These tools are optimal for a system's neuroscience approach to psychiatric disease because glia, mainly astrocytes and microglia, have demonstrated a central role in neurological and psychiatric disease over the past decade22,23. Our approach can measure the expressive response of glia and neurons concomitantly across numerous receptors and ligands involved in local paracrine signaling. Indeed, signaling can be inferred from these datasets using various quantitative methods such as fuzzy logic24. Further, the identification of cellular subphenotypes in neurons or glia and their function can provide insight into how brain cells in specific nuclei organize, respond to, and dysregulate at the single-cell level. The dynamics of this functional system can also be modeled with time series experiments16. Lastly, animal models can be perturbed anatomically or pharmacologically to lend a mechanistic condition to this system's approach.

Representative experiment:
Below, we provide an example of the application of these methods. This study investigated rat neuronal and microglia gene expression in the solitary nucleus (NTS) in response to alcohol dependence and subsequent withdrawal16. Rat cohorts comprised 1) Control, 2) Ethanol-dependent (EtOH), 3) 8 h withdrawal (Wd), 4) 32 h Wd, and 5) 176 h Wd (Figure 1A). Following rapid decapitation, brainstems were separated from the forebrain and cryosectioned, and slices were stained for tyrosine hydroxylase-positive (TH +) neurons and microglia (Figure 1B). LCM was used to collect both TH+ and TH- neurons and microglia. All the cells were from the NTS and analyzed as samples of 10-cell pools. Four 96 x 96 microfluidic RT-qPCR dynamic arrays were run on the RT-qPCR platform measuring 65 genes (Figure 1BC). Data were normalized using a -ΔΔCt method and analyzed using R, and single-cell selection was validated with molecular markers (Figure 1DE). Technical validation was further verified by technical replicates analyzed within a single batch and across batches (Figure 2 and Figure 3). TH+ and TH- neurons organized into different sub phenotypes with similar inflammatory gene clusters but differing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor (R) clusters (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Sub phenotypes that had elevated expression of inflammatory gene clusters were over-represented at 32 h Wd while GABA-receptor (GABAR) expression remained low in protracted alcohol withdrawal (176 h Wd). This work contributes to the antireward hypothesis of alcohol and opioid dependence which conjectures that interceptive feedback from the viscera in withdrawal contributes to the dysregulation of visceral-emotional neuronal nuclei (i.e., NTS and amygdala) resulting in more severe autonomic and emotional sequelae, which contribute to substance dependence (Figure 6).

Protocol

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Thomas Jefferson University. The protocol was approved by Thomas Jefferson University IACUC. 1. Animal model House male Sprague Dawley (>120 g, Harlan, Indianapolis, IN, USA) rat triplets individually with free access to ethanol-chow (2 rats) or control-chow mixture (1 rat). NOTE: This representative experiment employed the Lieber-DeCarli protoco…

Representative Results

Validation of single-cell collection is performed visually during LCM procedures. Cell nuclei are assessed at the QC station. The cell type can be determined by emission of tagged fluorophore for that cell type and its general morphology. If non-desired cells have been selected on the cap, their genetic material can be destroyed with a UV laser at the QC station. Further validation by molecular analysis is also necessary. In this representative example16, two types of neurons were selected-tyrosin…

Discussion

Alcohol use disorder remains a challenging disease to treat. Our group has approached this disorder by investigating antireward processes with a systems neuroscience perspective. We measured gene expression changes in single NTS neurons and microglia in an alcohol withdrawal time series16. The NTS was chosen for its prominent role in the autonomic dysregulation that occurs in alcohol withdrawal syndrome. We combine LCM with single-cell microfluidic RT-qPCR allowing for robust numbers of samples an…

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The work presented here was funded through NIH HLB U01 HL133360 awarded to JS and RV, NIDA R21 DA036372 awarded to JS and EVB, T32 AA-007463 awarded to Jan Hoek in support of SJO'S, and National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse: R01 AA018873.

Materials

20X DNA Binding Dye Fluidigm 100-7609 NA
2x GE Assay Loading Reagent Fluidigm 85000802-R NA
96.96 Dynamic Array IFC for Gene Expression (referred to as qPCR chip in text) Fluidigm BMK-M-96.96 NA
Anti-Cd11β Antibody Genway Biotech CCEC48 Microglia Stain
Anti-NeuN Antibody, clone A60 EMD Millipore MAB377 Neuronal Stain
Anti-tyrosine hydroxylase antibody abcam ab112 Stain for TH+ neurons
ArcturusXT Laser Capture Microdissection System Arcturus NA NA
Biomark HD Fluidigm NA RT-qPCR platform
Bovine Serum Antigen Sigma-Aldrich B4287
CapSure Macro LCM Caps ThermoFisher Scientific  LCM0211 NA
CellDirect One-Step qRT-PCR Kit ThermoFisher Scientific 11753500 Lysis buffer solution components
CellsDirect Resuspension & Lysis Buffer Kit ThermoFisher Scientific 11739010 Invitrogen
DAPI ThermoFisher Scientific 62248 Nucleus Stain
DNA Suspension Buffer TEKnova T0221
Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) ReadyProbe Secondary Antibody, Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) ReadyProbe Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 ThermoFisher Scientific R37118 Seconadry Antibody
Exonuclease I New Englnad BioLabs, Inc. M0293S NA
ExtracSure Sample Extraction Device ThermoFisher Scientific LCM0208 NA
FisherbrandTM Superfrost Plus Microscope Slides ThermoFisher Scientific 22-037-246 Plain glass slides
GeneAmp Thin-Walled Reaction Tube ThermoFisher Scientific N8010611
Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L), Superclona Recombinant Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 555 ThermoFisher Scientific A28180 Seconadry Antibody
IFC Controller Fluidigm NA NA
RNaseOut ThermoFisher Scientific 10777019
SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix with Low Rox Bio-Rad PN 172-5211 NA
SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit ThermoFisher Scientific 11754250 Contains VILO and SuperScript
T4 Gene 32 Protein New Englnad BioLabs, Inc. M0300S NA
TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix ThermoFisher Scientific 4391128 NA
TE Buffer TEKnova T0225 NA
TempPlate Semi-Skirted 96-Well PCR Plate, 0.2 mL USA Scientific 1402-9700 NA

Referenzen

  1. . Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/ (2020)
  2. Prevalence of Serious Mental Illness (SMI). NIH Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness.shtml (2020)
  3. Mattick, R. P., Kimber, J., Breen, C., Davoli, M., Mattick, R. P. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. , (2008).
  4. Mattick, R. P., Breen, C., Kimber, J., Davoli, M. Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009 (3), (2009).
  5. Miller, P. M., Book, S. W., Stewart, S. H. Medical treatment of alcohol dependence: A systematic review. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine. 42 (3), 227-266 (2012).
  6. Holmes, E. A., et al. The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on psychological treatments research in tomorrow’s science. The Lancet. Psychiatry. 5 (3), 237-286 (2018).
  7. Ford, C. L., Young, L. J. Translational opportunities for circuit-based social neuroscience: advancing 21st century psychiatry. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 68, 1-8 (2021).
  8. Holmes, E. A., Craske, M. G., Graybiel, A. M. Psychological treatments: A call for mental-health science. Nature. 511 (7509), 287-289 (2014).
  9. Miranda, A., Taca, A. Neuromodulation with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation is associated with reduction in signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal: a multisite, retrospective assessment. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 44 (1), 56-63 (2018).
  10. Metz, V. E., et al. Effects of ibudilast on the subjective, reinforcing, and analgesic effects of oxycodone in recently detoxified adults with opioid dependence. Neuropsychopharmacology. 42 (9), 1825-1832 (2017).
  11. Heinzerling, K. G., et al. placebo-controlled trial of targeting neuroinflammation with ibudilast to treat methamphetamine use disorder. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 15 (2), 238-248 (2020).
  12. Bogenschutz, M. P., et al. Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: A proof-of-concept study. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 29 (3), 289-299 (2015).
  13. O’Sullivan, S. J., Schwaber, J. S. Similarities in alcohol and opioid withdrawal syndromes suggest common negative reinforcement mechanisms involving the interoceptive antireward pathway. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 125, 355-364 (2021).
  14. O’Sullivan, S. J. Single-cell systems neuroscience: A growing frontier in mental illness. Biocell. 46 (1), 7-11 (2022).
  15. O’Sullivan, S. J., et al. Single-cell glia and neuron gene expression in the central amygdala in opioid withdrawal suggests inflammation with correlated gut dysbiosis. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 13, 665 (2019).
  16. O’Sullivan, S. J., McIntosh-Clarke, D., Park, J., Vadigepalli, R., Schwaber, J. S. Single cell scale neuronal and glial gene expression and putative cell phenotypes and networks in the nucleus tractus solitarius in an alcohol withdrawal time series. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 15, 739790 (2021).
  17. O’Sullivan, S. J., Reyes, B. A. S., Vadigepalli, R., Van Bockstaele, E. J., Schwaber, J. S. Combining laser capture microdissection and microfluidic qpcr to analyze transcriptional profiles of single cells: A systems biology approach to opioid dependence. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (157), e60612 (2020).
  18. Achanta, S., Vadigepalli, R. Single cell high-throughput qRT-PCR protocol. Protocols.io. , (2020).
  19. O’Sullivan, S. J. The interoceptive antireward pathway and gut dysbiosis in addiction. Journal of Psychiatry, Depression & Anxiety. 7 (40), 1-5 (2021).
  20. Park, J., et al. Single-cell transcriptional analysis reveals novel neuronal phenotypes and interaction networks involved in the central circadian clock. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 10, 481 (2016).
  21. Staehle, M. M., et al. Diurnal patterns of gene expression in the dorsal vagal complex and the central nucleus of the amygdala – Non-rhythm-generating brain regions. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14, 375 (2020).
  22. Réus, G. Z., et al. The role of inflammation and microglial activation in the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Neurowissenschaften. 300, 141-154 (2015).
  23. Zhang, X., et al. Role of astrocytes in major neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurochemical Research. 46 (10), 2715-2730 (2021).
  24. Park, J., Ogunnaike, B., Schwaber, J., Vadigepalli, R. Identifying functional gene regulatory network phenotypes underlying single cell transcriptional variability. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 117 (1), 87-98 (2015).
  25. Lieber, C. S., DeCarli, L. M. An experimental model of alcohol feeding and liver injury in the baboon. Journal of Medical Primatology. 3 (3), 153-163 (1974).
  26. Lieber, C. S., Decarli, L. M. Animal models of chronic ethanol toxicity. Methods in Enzymology. 233, 585-594 (1994).
  27. Park, J., et al. Inputs drive cell phenotype variability. Genome Research. 24 (6), 930-941 (2014).
  28. Paxinos, G., Watson, C. . The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates: Hard Cover Edition. , (1982).
check_url/de/64014?article_type=t

Play Video

Diesen Artikel zitieren
O’Sullivan, S. J., Srivastava, A., Vadigepalli, R., Schwaber, J. S. Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods. J. Vis. Exp. (186), e64014, doi:10.3791/64014 (2022).

View Video