Imaging the dynamic behavior of organelles and other subcellular structures in vivo can shed light on their function in physiological and disease conditions. Here, we present methods for genetically tagging two organelles, centrosomes and mitochondria, and imaging their dynamics in living zebrafish embryos using wide-field and confocal microscopy.
In vivo imaging provides unprecedented access to the dynamic behavior of cellular and subcellular structures in their natural context. Performing such imaging experiments in higher vertebrates such as mammals generally requires surgical access to the system under study. The optical accessibility of embryonic and larval zebrafish allows such invasive procedures to be circumvented and permits imaging in the intact organism. Indeed the zebrafish is now a well-established model to visualize dynamic cellular behaviors using in vivo microscopy in a wide range of developmental contexts from proliferation to migration and differentiation. A more recent development is the increasing use of zebrafish to study subcellular events including mitochondrial trafficking and centrosome dynamics. The relative ease with which these subcellular structures can be genetically labeled by fluorescent proteins and the use of light microscopy techniques to image them is transforming the zebrafish into an in vivo model of cell biology. Here we describe methods to generate genetic constructs that fluorescently label organelles, highlighting mitochondria and centrosomes as specific examples. We use the bipartite Gal4-UAS system in multiple configurations to restrict expression to specific cell-types and provide protocols to generate transiently expressing and stable transgenic fish. Finally, we provide guidelines for choosing light microscopy methods that are most suitable for imaging subcellular dynamics.
In vivo imaging provides direct visualization of cellular behaviors in the most physiological context. The transparency of zebrafish embryos, their rapid and external development and a rich array of genetic tools that permit fluorescent labeling have all contributed to the growing use of in vivo microscopy to elucidate the dynamics of key developmental events. Imaging studies of nervous system development in zebrafish have for example greatly expanded our knowledge of the behavior of neural progenitor cells and the fate of their progeny including their subsequent migration, differentiation and circuit integration1-8.
The stage is now set to investigate the subcellular dynamics underlying these cellular behaviors. Indeed, zebrafish are already being exploited as tools for in vivo cell biology. It is now possible to visualize mitochondria9-11, centrosomes2,8,12-14, Golgi15, the microtubule4 and actin16 cytoskeleton, endosomes17 and components of the apical membrane complex1,18, among other subcellular structures in zebrafish embryos in vivo. So far, much of what is known about the function of these organelles comes from studying their behavior in cultured cells. While in vitro studies have yielded tremendous insight into cell biology, cells in culture do not fully represent the complexity of the in vivo situation and therefore do not necessarily reflect the function and dynamics of subcellular organelles in vivo. Zebrafish embryos offer a viable in vivo alternative to examining subcellular dynamics.
As vertebrates, zebrafish possess many organ systems (e.g., neural retina) that are homologous to those found in mammalian species. Additionally, zebrafish embryos are increasingly being used to model human diseases19,20, including those related to centrosomal function (e.g., microcephaly21 and Leber's congenital amaurosis22) and to mitochondrial function (e.g., Parkinson's disease23, tauopathies10,24 and Barth syndrome25). In vivo imaging at the cellular and subcellular level in these instances will permit a better understanding of the cell biology underlying these pathological states.
The overall goal of the methods described here is to provide a comprehensive guide to investigate organelles and other subcellular structures in zebrafish embryos using in vivo light microscopy. The entire work-flow involved in visualizing and tracking subcellular structures in vivo is described – from genetic labeling approaches, to generating transiently expressing and stable transgenic fish, and finally to imaging using wide-field and confocal microscopy. While each of these procedures is used by numerous zebrafish laboratories, the protocols described are optimized and streamlined for investigating the dynamics of subcellular structures. Two specific aspects of the work described here warrant mention: First, the use of the Gal4-UAS expression system in multiple configurations to genetically label organelles in specific cell-types. Second, a direct comparison of wide-field and confocal microscopy to image subcellular structures in vivo.
Current strategies to genetically label organelles and other subcellular structures in zebrafish either make use of capped mRNA1,4,8 or DNA based constructs where promoter elements directly drive the expression of fusion proteins9,14,15. In vitro transcribed capped RNA results in rapid and broad expression, that is not tissue-specific however. Additionally, expression levels diminish over time as the capped RNA is diluted or degraded. Thus the use of RNA based constructs to examine organelle dynamics at later stages in development is limited (usually up to 3 days post-fertilization).
These limitations can be overcome by using DNA constructs, where spatial and temporal control of expression is determined by specific promoter elements. When DNA based constructs are used in the context of the Gal4-UAS system significant improvements to transgene expression levels are observed26,27. In this bipartite expression system, cell-type specific promoter elements drive the expression of a transcriptional activator Gal4, while reporter genes are cloned downstream of the Gal4-binding upstream activating sequence (UAS). By combining UAS reporters with appropriate Gal4 drivers, expression can be restricted to specific cell-types, circumventing the need to clone reporter genes behind different promoters every time a specific expression pattern is desired. Furthermore, the expression of multiple UAS reporter genes can be driven by a single Gal4 activator. The Gal4-UAS system thus provides a versatile and flexible genetic approach for subcellular labeling.
Wide-field and confocal microscopes are the workhorses of most laboratories. Wide-field systems typically use an arc lamp as a light source and detect the emitted light with a sensitive camera that is placed at the end of the light path. This imaging modality is typically restricted to thin samples as out-of focus light obscures in-focus information in thicker samples. Confocal microscopes differ from wide-field systems in that they are built to favor signals that originate from the focal plane over those that originate out of focus (i.e., "optical sectioning")28. To achieve optical sectioning a pinhole is placed in the emission path in a conjugate position to the point light source. Lasers are used as light sources and signals are detected with photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). Practically, a laser beam is swiped over the sample point-by-point and the fluorescence emission at each spot (pixel) is detected by the PMT.
Here we image the very same subcellular structures in living zebrafish embryos using both wide-field and confocal microscopy to provide a direct comparison of both microscopy modalities. The underlying aim of providing such comparisons is to offer guidelines for choosing the most appropriate microscopy technique for the specific question at hand.
Using the approaches described here we demonstrate Gal4-UAS based genetic labeling of mitochondria and centrosomes. These organelles are imaged in different cell-types of the nervous system and in muscle cells using wide-field and confocal microscopy to demonstrate the suitability of each imaging modality. The methods described here can easily be adapted for investigating other organelles and subcellular structures in the living zebrafish embryo.
Here, we demonstrate the versatility of the Gal4-UAS expression system to fluorescently tag mitochondria, centrosomes and the cellular membranes of specific cell-types in vivo in zebrafish embryos. Many fluorescent fusion proteins that label other organelles or subcellular structures can be found in the published literature and can be obtained from the respective laboratory, commercial sources or non-commercial plasmid depositories (e.g., Addgene). To design a new fluorescent fusion protein, several par…
The authors have nothing to disclose.
P.E. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Research Training Group 1373 and the Graduate School of the Technische Universität München (TUM-GS). G.P. was supported by TUM-GS. L.T. is supported by an EMBO fellowship (EMBO ALTF 108-2013). D.P.’s work on zebrafish was supported by the DFG through the Sonderforschungsbereich “Molecular Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration” (SFB 596); the Center for Integrated Protein Sciences (Munich) and the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant agreement no. 200611 (MEMOSAD). He is currently a New York Stem Cell Foundation-Druckenmiller Fellow and was supported by a fellowship from the German Academy of Sciences Leopoldina. L.G. is supported by funding from the DFG through SFB 870 “Assembly and Function of Neuronal Circuits”, Project A11.
We are grateful to Kristina Wullimann for maintaining our fish facility, Yvonne Hufnagel for technical support and Thomas Misgeld for comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to R. Köster (Technische Universität Braunschweig) for providing the M1 Medusa vector (pSKmemmRFP:5xUAS:H2B-CFP:5xUAS:Centrin2-YFP) from which we cloned out Centrin-YFP and S.C. Suzuki and T. Yoshimatsu (University of Washington) for providing the 14xUAS:MA-cerulean cassette which we used to generate the reporter construct to make CentrinFish. We further thank S.C. Suzuki and T. Yoshimatsu (University of Washington) for the Otx2:Gal4 transgenic line, A. Sagasti for the Sensory:Gal4-VP16 construct (UCLA) and M. Nonet (Washington University in St. Louis) for the pCold Heart Tol2 vector. We acknowledge Bettina Schmid, Alexander Hruscha and Christian Haass (German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Munich – DZNE) for contributing to the development of MitoFish.
Agarose (2-hydroxyethylagarose) | Sigma-Aldrich | A4018-10G | Low-gelling temperature Type VII |
Block heater | Eppendorf | Thermomixer compact | |
Ca(NO3)2 Calcium nitrate hydrate, 99.996% | Aldrich | 202967-50g | To prepare 30x Danieau's |
CCD camera | Qimaging | Retiga Exi Fast 1394 | |
Ceramic Coated Dumont #5 Forceps | Dumont – Fine Science Tools | 11252-50 | #5 Forceps |
Confocal laser-scanning microscope | Olympus | FV1000 Fluoview | |
Culture dish heater | Warner Instrument Corporation | DH-35 | Heating ring |
Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfate salt | Fluka Analytical | A5040-100G | Tricaine (anesthetic) |
Fluorescence dissecting microscope | Leica | M205 FA | |
GeneClean kit | MP Biomedicals | 111001200 | |
Glass Bottom Culture Dishes | MatTek Corporation | P35G-0-14-C | 35mm petri dish, 14mm microwell, No. 0 coverglass |
Glass needles | World Precision Instruments Inc. | TW100F-4 | For microinjections |
HEPES | Sigma | H3375-250g | To prepare 30x Danieau's |
High vacuum grease | Dow Corning | DCC000001242 150g | Silicon dioxide grease |
Incubator | Thermo Scientific | Heraeus | To maintain zebrafish embryos at 28.5⁰ C |
KCl 99% | Sigma-Aldrich | S7643-5kg | To prepare 30x Danieau's |
MgSO4.7H2O Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate 98+% A.C.S reagent | Sigma-Aldrich | 230291-500g | To prepare 30x Danieau's |
Microinjector | Eppendorf | FemtoJet | |
Microloader tips | Eppendorf | 930001007 | 0.5-20uL |
Micromanipulator | Maerzhaeuser Wetzlar | MM33 Rechts/00-42-101-0000/M3301R | |
Micropipette holder | Intracel | P/N 50-00XX-130-1 | |
mMESSAGE mMACHINE SP6 Transcription Kit | Ambion | AM1340 | To transcribe PCS-Transposase |
NaCl BioXtra >99.5% | Sigma-Aldrich | P9541-1kg | To prepare 30x Danieau's |
Nanophotometer | To measure DNA/RNA concentration | ||
Needle puller | Sutter Instrument | P-1000 | Flaming/Brown |
NIR Apo 40x/0.80W | Nikon | Water-dipping-cone objective | |
N-Phenylthiourea Grade I, approx. 98% | Sigma | P7629-10G | PTU (prevents pigmentation) |
Petri dishes | Sarstedt AG | 821472 | 92 x 16mm |
Plastic molds | Adaptive Science Tools | TU-1 | For microinjections |
Plexiglas cover-with a hole | Custom-made | The hole in the Plexiglas cover should be 3 mm larger than the diameter of the water-dipping-cone objective | |
Tea-strainer (Plastic) | To collect zebrafish eggs | ||
Temperature controller | Warner Instrument Corporation | TC-344B | Dual Automatic Temperature Controller |
Transfer pipettes | Sarstedt AG | 86.1171 | 3.5mL plastic transfer pipettes |
UMPlanFI 100x/1.00W | Olympus | Water-dipping-cone objective | |
UMPlanFLN 20x/0.50W | Olympus | Water-dipping-cone objective | |
Widefield microscope | Olympus | BX51WI | |
PTU (50x Stock) | Dissolve 76 mg PTU in 50 ml distilled water Stir vigorously at room temperature Store at -20 oC in 1 ml aliquots Use at 1x working solution |
||
Tricaine (20x Stock) | Dissolve 200 mg Tricaine in 48 ml distilled water Add 2 ml 1M Tris base (pH9) Adjust to pH 7 Store at -20 oC in 1 ml aliquots Use at 1x working solution |
||
Danieau's Solution (30x Stock) | 1740 mM NaCl <21 mM KCl 12 mM MgSO4.7H2O 18 mM Ca (NO3)2 150 mM HEPES buffer Distilled water upto 1 L Store at 4 oC Use at 0.3x working solution |