Summary

原位曝光法测定淡水珍珠贻贝 Bioindication 的流环境适宜性

Published: September 05, 2018
doi:

Summary

原位bioindications 能够确定环境对濒危贻贝种类的适宜性。我们描述了两种方法基于青少年暴露的淡水珍珠贻贝在网箱贫营养泥炭河生境。这两种方法都是在开放水和交错水环境的变型中实现的。

Abstract

对淡水贻贝生境适宜性的认识是保护濒危物种群体的重要一步。我们描述了一个协议,贫营养泥炭河流域内进行现场青少年暴露试验, 为期一个月和三月的时间。两种方法 (在两种修改中) 都是为了评估青少年的生长和生存率。方法和修改在价值为地方 bioindication 不同, 并且每个有它的好处并且制约。沙笼法适用于一大组个体, 但只有部分个体被测量, 结果被大量评估。在网格笼法中, 分别对个体进行了单独的保存和测量, 但计算出了低个体数。公开的水接触改性比较容易应用;它显示了青少年的生长潜力, 也可以有效的水毒性试验。在床内暴露的修改需要很高的工作量, 但更接近自然的青少年环境的条件, 它是更好地报告的实际适宜性的地方。另一方面, 由于其高交错的环境变异性, 此修改需要更多的复制。

Introduction

实验生物体的现场暴露和随后对其病情的评估是获取环境质量信息和 (特别是) 物种适宜性的一种可能方法。在动物体内, 这种 bioindication 主要适用于能够生活在有限的有界空间中的小无脊椎动物。双壳贝类的年轻阶段 (双壳类) 是一个这样适当的有机体小组1

家庭 Unionidae 的双壳贝类是水生生态系统的一个非常重要的组成部分2。然而, 这些物种往往严重濒危, 特别是在溪流和河流。其中一些被描绘成 “伞种”, 其保护与整个溪流群落生境的养护密切相关, 需要采取综合办法3。这些动物的生命周期与许多环境成分有关, 从水化学4,5到鱼类种群的变化, 作为贻贝幼虫宿主6。因为贻贝幼鱼通常代表贻贝生命周期的关键阶段, 所以在这个阶段适合它们发展的地点对于一个地区成功的物种种群发展至关重要。

淡水珍珠贻贝 (FWPM,母母;Unionida, 双壳类) 是一种濒危的双壳贝类, 发生在贫营养泥炭欧洲溪流中。他们的人数在20世纪的整个发生地区急剧下降。在大多数中欧人口中, 目前物种繁殖的下降似乎主要是由于青少年在生命的头几年中生存率极低至零。它假设, 少年 FWPMs 居住在浅交错区7年, 其中条件和他们的可变性仍然没有被描述的很好。此外, 直到他们的第二年的生活, 幼仔只有一个维度约1毫米, 所以他们很难找到在大量的泥沙下自然条件8。因此, 对圈养幼仔进行实验是研究其生态学的必要条件。

在捷克9淡水珍珠贻贝行动计划中, 每年有数以千计的青少年从半自然育种计划中崛起。然而, 有一个问题是, 哪些地方和生境适合这些青少年成功的人口支持, 或最终物种重新引进。在原位bioindications 现在找到答案的方法。

尽管在早先的一些著作中观察到幼贻贝在生物指标10的适宜性, 但最近的一些研究证实, 在暴露笼中, 幼贻贝的存活率不一致。青少年暴露方法在水质检测中的适用性111213。此外, 还证明了在解释这些特定研究的结果时需要考虑的几个因素, 例如14的股票来源和幼虫条件15的持续影响。

问题在于如何在测试现场安装实验性青少年, 以及如何最有效地评估其状况。首次严格应用的现场曝光方法与青少年 FWPMs 发表了 Buddensiek16。青少年 FWPM 个体被保存在板笼中, 暴露在溪流的自由流动的水中, 在几个星期的暴露后, 它们的生存和生长被量化。该方法最初是作为一种半人工育种方法开发的, 但同时也强调了其对生境需求和水质评价的适用性。虽然 FWPM 少年的存活率自然非常低, 在一个月/年的规模, 只有很小数量的动物将生存, 生存率可以是一个良好的标志的环境影响的16周的规模。经过多年的研究, 进一步发展了暴露方法, 以保持实验性的幼贻贝在溪流中栖息, 并评估其生长和成活率;这些包括沙盒17, 贻贝筒仓基于一个上升的原则18, 和各种其他接触笼 (由牙龈和同事总结)11。由于青少年自然发生在浅交错区7, 实验装置在流底的应用是非常可取的。

在本文中, 我们描述了使用两个曝光装置的 FWPMs: i) 修改 Buddensiek 板笼 (“网笼”) 也使 bioindication 测试 hyporheal 条件;和 ii) Hruška 沙盒 (“沙笼”)。该议定书描述了这两种方法在开阔水域和交错条件下的应用 (四种暴露的变体)。这些方法在捷克淡水珍珠贻贝9号行动计划中的应用已有15年的时间逐步修改和扩大, 并经过了一系列实验验证。

Protocol

1. 网笼 注: 见图 1。 准备材料 为实验部分准备材料: 1-2 L 每网笼水, 网笼 (1 主要塑料体, 2 塑料盖, 2 张特殊技术筛子与340µm 毛孔, 4 个螺栓和4坚果每笼), 钳子, 扳手, 巴斯德吸管, 过滤器, 数码相机, 三目照相解剖变焦立体显微镜, 校准网格 (显微镜设备), 5 培养皿50毫米直径, 烧杯, 2 塑料碟 (~ 25 厘米 x 15 厘米 x 3-5 厘米), 和一个塑?…

Representative Results

采用四种 bioindication 方法 (开放水沙笼、床内砂笼、露天网箱、内网网箱), 研究了上伏尔塔瓦河河流域 FWPMs 的环境条件适宜性 (捷克波希米亚森林共和国)。这条河代表一 FWPM 残余地方在中欧之内19。在这里, 我们提出了一组特别选定的结果, 说明了四方法的最重要的方面。进一步的细节被描述在一个全面的研究Černá等。13。 <p cl…

Discussion

曝光时间:

即使是一个月的裸露的网笼显示了明显的增长, 反映了现场之间的差异 (图 3), 所以它们是非常有用的快速和容易检测的现场描述。然而, 结果的相关性取决于条件的短期状态, 可以振荡。特别是, 短期降雨事件可以起到作用。相比之下, 不可预知的偶发污染可能并不总是被记录下来。在现场 V (图 4A), 水化学分析检测到一波强?…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Bílý和 Ondřej. 西蒙得到了捷克生命科学大学的赠款的支持 [环境科学学院的内部赠款机构, CULS 布拉格 (42110 1312 3175 (20164236))]。对 Douda 的支持来自捷克科学基金会 (13-05872S)。在捷克共和国自然保护局管理的捷克淡水珍珠贻贝行动计划执行期间, 收集了关于珍珠贻贝的 bioindication 和目前发生情况的数据, 由政府资助捷克共和国, 可在

Materials

biological material maintenance and care
Freshwater pearl mussel juveniles any NA from a FWPM breeding programme
plastic boxes any NA
thermobox MERCI 212,070,600,030 There are many possibilities. This is one example only.
field thermobox (ca25 l) any NA cold box (insulated box) commonly used for food transport
river water any NA
Petri dishes any NA
plastic Pasteur pipettes with balloon bulb (droppers) any NA hole diameter 1 mm
hydrogen peroxide any NA
plastic container (ca 50 l) for river water any NA
plastic tea strainer any NA commonly used in kitchen
mesh cages construction
main plastic bodies any NA
plactic covers any NA
special technical sieves 340 µm Silk &Progress UHELON 20 T
special technical sieves 100 µm Silk &Progress UHELON 67 M
rubber hose (diameter  5.5 mm) any NA
steel bolts any NA
steel nuts any NA
spanner any NA
steel spikes any NA
pliers any NA
beakers any NA
plastic dishes (ca. 25x15x3-5cm) any NA
squirt bottle any NA
field protocols any NA
stationery any NA
plastic container any NA
string any NA
hammer any NA
sandy cages construction and use
sieve 1 mm any NA
sieve 2 mm any NA
special technical sieves 340 µm Silk &Progress UHELON 20 T
plastic boxes with tight-fitting lid any NA
hot melt adhesive any NA
plastic box (ca 250 x 150 x 100 cm)
big plastic box (ca 25 l) any NA
flat stone any NA
net any NA
river sand any NA
round containers any NA
magnifying glasses Carson Carson CP 60 There ar many possibilities. This is one example only
cages installation and maintenance
field temperature dataloggers ONSET UA-001-64 http://www.onsetcomp.com/products/data-loggers/ua-001-64
spade any NA
toothbrush any NA
experiment evaluation
trinocular dissecting zoom stereo microscope Bresser optic ICD 10x-160x There are many possibilities. This is one example only.
digital camera/ electronic eyepiece Bresser optic MikroCamLab 5M There are many possibilities. This is one example only.
Calibration  gird Am Scope SKU: MR100 There are many possibilities. This is one example only.
external power source with two movable light guides Arsenal K1309010150021 There are many possibilities. This is one example only.
Image software ImageJ software There are many possibilities. This is one example only.
table processor MS excel There are many possibilities. This is one example only.

References

  1. Goldberg, E. D. The mussel watch-a first step in global marine monitoring. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 6 (7), 111-114 (1975).
  2. Vaughn, C. C. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia. , (2017).
  3. Lopes-Lima, M., et al. Conservation status of freshwater mussels in Europe: state of the art and future challenges. Biological Reviews. 92 (1), 572-607 (2017).
  4. Strayer, D. L., Malcom, H. M. Causes of recruitment failure in freshwater mussel populations in southeastern New York. Ecological Applications. 22 (6), 1780-1790 (2012).
  5. Douda, K. Effects of nitrate nitrogen pollution on Central European unionid bivalves revealed by distributional data and acute toxicity testing. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 20 (2), 189-197 (2010).
  6. Modesto, V., et al. Fish and mussels: importance of fish for freshwater mussel conservation. Fish and Fisheries. , (2017).
  7. Bauer, G., Wächtler, K. . Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoida. 145, 1-394 (2001).
  8. Neves, R. J., Widlak, J. C. Habitat ecology of juvenile fresh-water mussels (Bivalvia, Unionidae) in a headwater stream in Virginia. American Malacological Bulletin. 5, 1-7 (1987).
  9. Švanyga, J., Simon, O. P., Mináriková, T., Spisar, O., Bílý, M. . Záchranný program pro perlorodku říční v ČR (Action plan for the endangered freshwater pearl mussel in the Czech Republic). , (2013).
  10. Schmidt, C., Vandré, R. Ten years of experience in the rearing of young freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 20 (7), 735-747 (2010).
  11. Gum, B., Lange, M., Geist, J. A critical reflection on the success of rearing and culturing juvenile freshwater mussels with a focus on the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 21 (7), 743-751 (2011).
  12. Denic, M., Taeubert, J. E., Lange, M., Thielen, F., Scheder, C., Gumpinger, C., Geist, J. Influence of stock origin and environmental conditions on the survival and growth of juvenile freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) in a cross-exposure experiment. Limnologica. 50, 67-74 (2015).
  13. Černá, M., Simon, O. P., Bílý, M., Douda, K., Dort, B., Galová, M., Volfová, M. Within-river variation in growth and survival of juvenile freshwater pearl mussels assessed by in situ exposure methods. Hydrobiologia. , (2017).
  14. Denic, M., Taeubert, J. E. Trophic relationships between the larvae of two freshwater mussels and their fish hosts. Invertebrate Biology. 134 (2), 129-135 (2015).
  15. Douda, K. Host-dependent vitality of juvenile freshwater mussels: implications for breeding programs and host evaluation. Aquaculture. 445, 5-10 (2015).
  16. Buddensiek, V. The culture of juvenile freshwater pearl mussels Margaritifera margaritifera L. in cages: a contribution to conservation programmes and the knowledge of habitat requirements. Biological Conservation. 74 (1), 33-40 (1995).
  17. Hruška, J. Experience of semi-natural breeding program of freshwater pearl mussel in the Czech Republic. Die Flussperlmuschel in Europa: Bestandssituation und Schutzmaßnahmen. , 69-75 (2001).
  18. Barnhart, M. C. Buckets of muckets: a compact system for rearing juvenile freshwater mussels. Aquaculture. 254 (1), 227-233 (2006).
  19. Simon, O. P., Vaníčková, I., Bílý, M., Douda, K., Patzenhauerová, H., Hruška, J., Peltánová, A. The status of freshwater pearl mussel in the Czech Republic: several successfully rejuvenated populations but the absence of natural reproduction. Limnologica. 50, 11-20 (2015).
  20. . A language and environment for statistical computing Available from: https://www.r-project.org/ (2013)
  21. Hastie, L. C., Yang, M. R. . Conservation of the freshwater pearl mussel I: captive breeding techniques. 2, (2003).
  22. Hruška, J. Nahrungsansprüche der Flußperlmuschel und deren halbnatürliche Aufzucht in der Tschechischen Republik. Heldia. 4 (6), 69-79 (1999).
  23. Scheder, C., Lerchegger, B., Jung, M., Csar, D., Gumpinger, C. Practical experience in the rearing of freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera): advantages of a work-saving infection approach, survival, and growth of early life stages. Hydrobiologia. 735 (1), 203-212 (2014).
  24. Braun, A., Auerswald, K., Geist, J. Drivers and spatio-temporal extent of hyporheic patch variation: implications for sampling. PLoS ONE. 7 (7), e42046 (2012).
  25. Franken, R. J. M., Storey, R. G., Williams, D. D. Biological, chemical and physical characteristics of downwelling and upwelling zones in the hyporheic zone of a north-temperate stream. Hydrobiologia. , 183-195 (2001).
  26. Roley, S. S., Tank, J. L. Pore water physicochemical constraints on the endangered clubshell mussel (Pleurobema clava). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 73 (12), 1712-1722 (2016).
  27. Larson, J. H., Eckert, N. L., Bartsch, M. R. Intrinsic variability in shell and soft tissue growth of the freshwater mussel Lampsilis siliquoidea. PLoS ONE. 9 (11), e112252 (2014).
  28. Lavictoire, L., Moorkens, E., Ramsey, A. D., Sinclair, W., Sweeting, R. A. Effects of substrate size and cleaning regime on growth and survival of captive-bred juvenile freshwater pearl mussels, Margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758). Hydrobiologia. 766 (1), 89-102 (2015).
  29. Hruška, J. Experience of semi-natural breeding programme of freshwater pearl mussel in the Czech Republic. Die Flussperlmuschel in Europa: Bestandssituation und Schutzmassnahmen. , 69-75 (2000).
  30. Bayne, B. L. Physiological components of growth differences between individual oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and a comparison with Saccostrea commercialis. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 72 (6), 705-713 (1999).
  31. Tamayo, D., Azpeitia, K., Markaide, P., Navarro, E., Ibarrola, I. Food regime modulates physiological processes underlying size differentiation in juvenile intertidal mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis. Marine Biology. 163 (6), (2016).
check_url/kr/57446?article_type=t

Play Video

Cite This Article
Bílý, M., Němčíková, S., Simon, O. P., Douda, K., Barák, V., Dort, B. Bioindication Testing of Stream Environment Suitability for Young Freshwater Pearl Mussels Using In Situ Exposure Methods. J. Vis. Exp. (139), e57446, doi:10.3791/57446 (2018).

View Video