A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Modeling and Imaging 3-Dimensional Collective Cell Invasion

16.7K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/3525

⸱

December 7th, 2011

 ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

Models of tumor cell invasion into three-dimensional extracellular matrix better reflect the in vivo situation than two-dimensional motility assays. Using matrix invasion assays combined with confocal imaging of fluorescently-labeled cells, detailed information on invasion modes and the distinct contributions of leading versus following cells can be obtained.

Abstract

A defining characteristic of cancer malignancy is invasion and metastasis 1. In some cancers (e.g. glioma 2), local invasion into surrounding healthy tissue is the root cause of disease and death. For other cancers (e.g. breast, lung, etc.), it is the process of metastasis, in which tumor cells move from a primary tumor mass, colonize distal sites and ultimately contribute to organ failure, that eventually leads to morbidity and mortality 3. It has been estimated that invasion and metastasis are responsible for 90% of cancer deaths 4. As a result, there has been intense interest in identifying the molecular processes and critical protein mediators of invasion and metastasis for the purposes of improving diagnosis and treatment 5.

A challenge for cancer scientists is to develop invasion assays that sufficiently resemble the in vivo situation to enable accurate disease modeling 6. Two-dimensional cell motility assays are only informative about one aspect of invasion and do not take into account extracellular matrix (ECM) protein remodeling which is also a critical element. Recently, research has refined our understanding of tumor cell invasion and revealed that individual cells may move by elongated or rounded modes 7. In addition, there has been greater appreciation of the contribution of collective invasion, in which cells invade in strands, sheets and clusters, particularly in highly differentiated tumors that maintain epithelial characteristics, to the spread of cancer 8.

We present a refined method 9 for examining the contributions of candidate proteins to collective invasion 10. In particular, by engineering separate pools of cells to express different fluorescent proteins, it is possible to molecularly dissect the activities and proteins required in leading cells versus those required in following cells. The use of RNAi provides the molecular tool to experimentally disassemble the processes involved in individual cell invasion as well as in different positions of collective invasion. In this procedure, mixtures of fluorescently-labeled cells are plated on the bottom of a Transwell insert previously filled with Matrigel ECM protein, then allowed to invade "upwards" through the filter and into the Matrigel. Reconstruction of z-series image stacks, obtained by confocal imaging, into three-dimensional representations allows for visualization of collectively invading strands and analysis of the representation of fluorescently-labeled cells in leading versus following positions.

Protocol

1. Retroviral labeling of cells with fluorescent proteins

  1. Plate retroviral packaging cells (e.g. Phoenix) out at 0.25 x 106 cells per well of a 6-well dish in 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)/DMEM.
  2. Transfect cells with retroviral DNA 48 hours later cells using Effectene according to the manufacturers' instructions.
  3. Rinse wells twice with medium 24 hours later, then add 1.5 ml of 10% FBS/DMEM per well.
  4. Collect packaged virus in tissue culture medium 48 hours later by pipetting and transferring to 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes.
  5. Centrifuge at 1600 rpm for 5 min to pellet any cells.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Matrigel invasion assays have traditionally been set up with cells placed onto a layer of extracellular matrix protein with chemoattractant-induced motility towards and through a filter at the bottom. Invasiveness was scored as a function of how many cells could be counted on the underside of the filter. Although practically there is little difference with the “inverse” invasion assay described above, there is considerably more information about the process of invasion that can be determined by visualizing in.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research is from Cancer Research UK.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium)GIBCO, by Life Technologies21969
Fetal Bovine SerumPAA LaboratoriesA15-101
Penicillin StreptomycinGIBCO, by Life Technologies15140
200 mM L-Glutamine (100x)GIBCO, by Life Technologies25050-032
PuromycinSigma-AldrichP8833
0.05% Trypsin EDTAGIBCO, by Life Technologies25300
PolybreneSigma-AldrichAL-118
Lipofectamine 2000 ReagentInvitrogen11668019
6.5mm Transwells, 8.0 μm pore size Corning3422
Complete MatrigelBD Biosciences354234
Calcein AMInvitrogenC1430
RNaseQiagen19101
Propidium IodideSigma-AldrichP4864
Confocal microcopeLeica MicrosystemsSP2MP

References

  1. Olson, M. F., Sahai, E. The actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell motility. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 26, 273-287 (2008).
  2. Hoelzinger, D. B., Demuth, T., Berens, M. E. Autocrine factors that sustain glioma invasion and paracrine biology in the brain microenvironm....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

3D Invasion AssayTranswell Matrigel SystemConfocal Microscopy ImagingFluorescent Protein LabelingRNAi Knockdown MethodCell Transduction ProtocolMatrigel ECM ProteinThree Dimensional ReconstructionInvasion Quantification Analysis